Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:46:14.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Post-Palin Calculus: The 2012 Republican Veepstakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2012

Jody C Baumgartner
Jody C Baumgartner*
Affiliation:
East Carolina University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article results are presented from a conditional logit model of vice presidential selection that correctly predicts Mitt Romney selecting Paul Ryan as his vice presidential running mate in 2012. The model, which correctly predicts 14 of the 20 contested major party vice presidential nominations from 1960 through 2008, suggests that media exposure, political experience, having served in the military, age, and gender/racial/ethnic diversity are significant factors in selecting a vice presidential candidate in the modern era.

Type
Spotlight
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 605 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Mike, Gibson, Ginger, and Haberman, Maggie. 2012. “Behind the scenes, Romney wanted Ryan.” Politico. August 12. Available at http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79630.html.Google Scholar
Allen, Mike, and VandeHei, Jim. 2012. “Tim Pawlenty's Stock Soars in Romney-World.” Politico. June 20. Available at ⟨www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77619.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Cohen, Richard E.. 2006. The Almanac of American Politics, 2006. Washington, DC: National Journal Group.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. 2008. “The Veepstakes: Forecasting Vice Presidential Selection in 2008.” PS: Politics & Political Science 41 (4): 765–72.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. Forthcoming. “Vice Presidential Selection in the Convention Era: Experience or Electoral Advantage?” In Congress and the Presidency.Google Scholar
“The Biographical Directory of the United States Congress (1774–Present).” (no date). Available at ⟨http://bioguide.congress.gov/⟩.Google Scholar
Garraty, John A., and Carnes, Mark C., eds. 1999. American National Biography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Habernan, Maggie. 2011. “Veepstakes Speculation Heats Up.” Politico. 18 August. http://news.yahoo.com/veepstakes-speculation-heats-094700555.html (March 22, 2012).Google Scholar
Hiller, Mark, and Kriner, Douglas. 2008. “Institutional Change and the Dynamic of Vice Presidential Selection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38: 401–21.Google Scholar
Mayer, William G. 2000. “A Brief History of Vice Presidential Selection.” In In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees, ed. Mayer, William G.. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
McFadden, Daniel. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka, Paul. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scarborough, Joe. 2012. “Avoiding the Perils of Palin.” Politico. June 20. Available at www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77634.html.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1997. “‘The Veepstakes’: Strategic Choice in Presidential Running Mate Selection.” American Political Science Review 91: 855–64.Google Scholar
Who's Who in America. 1940 et seq. Chicago: A.N. Marquis.Google Scholar