Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:00:39.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Censorship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Marsha Nye Adler
Marsha Nye Adler*
Affiliation:
People For the American Way
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rarely in American politics is there a confluence of events that creates a dramatic clash of issues. The Texas textbook controversy and two recent federal court cases pitted opposing interest groups against each other—with illuminating results.

The Religious Right and Censorship

Protestant evangelicals and other fundamentalist Christians share a common belief in the inerrancy of the Bible and a constellation of attitudes based on localism, conventional moral standards, traditionalist family values, and vocal “Americanism” (Guth, 1983, p. 64). Traditionally, evangelical and fundamentalist church members and their leaders have been among the least politically active groups in America. These sects are dominated by adherents who are more rural and less wealthy than other nonfundamentalists, and are led by conservative, nonpolitical pastors. The many fundamentalist denominations are congregationally based, and historically have remained quite separate as a result of infighting and rivalry over interpretation of scripture.

By the mid-1970s, however, government policies on affirmative action, Supreme Court decisions on abortion, civil rights and school prayer, and social movements among women, gays and anti-war protestors threatened fundamentalists' traditional beliefs and values. Fundamentalist leaders began to speak out, reflecting their followers' fears. Groups began to appear that translated fundamentalist values into rhetoric and then into political action. Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jim Bakker, Oral Roberts, James Robison, Rex Humbard and others took their message to vast audiences as their church services and religious talk shows began appearing on hundreds of television stations. As the evangelists' audiences grew, the content of the shows grew more political, as the preachers urged their viewers to act on their beliefs.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Winter 1988 , pp. 18 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Melinda et al. , July 18, 1986. A Reprise of Scopes. Newsweek.Google Scholar
Christian Broadcasting Network. May 13, 1984. The 700 Club.Google Scholar
Guth, James L. 1983. The Politics of the Christian Right. In Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A. eds., Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Samuel S., and Owen, Dennis E. 1982. The Religious Right in America. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, Edward B. 1986. The Schoolbook Protest Movement. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.Google Scholar
LaHaye, Beverly. 1987. Whose Ethics in the Government Schools? Kappa Delta Pi Record.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, Christy, and Seidman, Ricki. 1987. Attacks on ‘Secular Humanism’: The Real Threat to Public Education. Kappa Delta Pi Record.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozert v. Hawkins, 647 F. Supp. 1194 (E.D.Tenn. 1986), rev'd, 827 F.2d 1058 (6th Cir. 1987), petition for Cert. filed Jan. 4, 1988 (No. 87–1100).Google Scholar
People For the American Way. 1987a. Attacks on the Freedom to Learn, 1986–87 Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
People For the American Way. February 27, 1987b. Public Education on Trial. Background briefing.Google Scholar
Smith v. Commissioners, 655 F. Supp. 939 (S.D. Ala. 1987), rev'd 827 F.2d 684 (11th Cir. 1987).Google Scholar