Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:39:46.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political Scientist as Local Campaign Consultant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

Robert E. Crew Jr.
Affiliation:
Florida State University

Extract

During my 45 years as an academic, I have followed the admonition sometimes attributed to the legendary Jedi warrior Obi-Wan Kenobe that political scientists should “use [their] power for good and not for evil.” In this spirit, I have devoted substantial portions of my career to public service by providing strategic advice and campaign management to candidates for small state and local elective offices—state legislature, county commission, city clerk or treasurer, school board, and the like—and supporters of citizen ballot initiatives. These campaigns generally cannot afford the professional campaign assistance that is now virtually a necessity for winning elections at all levels of government.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, Jonathan, and Dominguez, Casey. 2003. “Candidates and Candidacies in the Expanded Party.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36: 165–69.Google Scholar
Cotter, Cornelius, Gibson, James L., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1994. Party Organization in American Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Crew, Robert E. Jr., and Bayliss, Slater. Forthcoming. The Florida Elections of 2008: Change! But Only at the Top of the Ticket. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Daniel. 1986. “The Party Activist in Detroit and Los Angeles: A Longitudinal View 1956–1980.” In Political Parties in Local Areas, ed. Crotty, William J., 89120. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2006. “Habitual Voting and Behavioral Turnout.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., and Shachar, R.. 2003. “Voting May be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 540–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D., and Green, Alan. 2008. Get Out the Vote. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., and Shachar, R.. 2000. “Habit Formation and Political Behavior: Evidence of Consuetude in Voter Turnout.” British Journal of Political Science 30: 561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Dennis W. 2001. No Place for Amateurs: How Political Consultants are Reshaping American Democracy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lathrop, Douglas. 2003. The Campaign Continues: How Political Consultants and Campaign Tactics Affect Public Policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, James. 2007. “The Union of Scholarship and Politics: A Troubled Marriage and a Think Tank Affair, But No Divorce.” Paper presented to the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Chicago, March 2.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2009. “Street Fight: The Impact of a Street Sign Campaign on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies 8 (2): 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelosi, Christine. 2007. Campaign Boot Camp. Sausalito, CA: PoliPoint.Google Scholar
Plutzer, E. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 4156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, David. 1973. The Election Men: Professional Campaign Managers and American Democracy. New York: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Mildred. 1990. The Party Network. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Shea, Daniel M., and Green, John. 2007. “Local Parties and Mobilizing the Vote.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, ed. Green, John and Coffey, Daniel, 217–30. 5th ed. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review 66: 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Glaser, James, and Griffin, Robert. 1990. “Information and Electoral Choice.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. Ferejohn, John and Kuklinski, James, 117–35. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar