Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:25:55.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Science, Disciplinary History and Theoretical Pluralism: A Response to Almond and Eckstein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Michael T. Gibbons
Michael T. Gibbons*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 44 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1990

References

Almond, Gabriel. 1988. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science,” PS: Political Science & Politics, Fall 1988, Vol. XXI, No. 4, pp. 828–42.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Comte, August. 1975. August Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings, Lenzer, Gertrud, ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1971. The Evaluation of Political Performance. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1989. “A Comment on Positive Theory,” PS: Political Science & Politics, March 1989, Vol. XXII, No. 1, p. 77.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. New York: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. “The Discourse on Language,” in Foucault, , The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 215–37.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary. 1980. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1977. Critical Theory. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1961. August Comte and Positivism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1961. Foresight and Understanding. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1972. “Political Theory as a Vocation,” in Fleisher, Martin, ed., Machiavelli and the Nature of Political Thought. New York: Atheneum Books, pp. 23–75.Google Scholar