Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:33:39.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Science and Political Philosophy: An Uneasy Relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Steven B. Smith
Steven B. Smith*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From its very beginnings political science has been a complex discipline torn in conflicting directions. Consider Aristotle's Politics, the first book that looks like a contemporary political science monograph. In the book, Aristotle presented two opposing strands of argument that he managed with tolerable success to hold together. On the one hand, Aristotle treated the study of politics as a branch of practical knowledge, its aim being action (praxis), not theory. Political action is always contextual or circumstantial, the action of particular agents faced with a particular set of circumstances. Therefore, the student of politics needs to be concerned above all with learning the art of political judgment, with how to think and deliberate well under specific circumstances. Aristotle wrote the Politics for men situated in popular assemblies, courts of law, and councils of war. He presented politics as inseparable from rhetoric, the art of public persuasion. Aristotle believed that the perspective of the political theorist should not depart too far from that of the citizen or statesman.

Yet, at the same time, Aristotle acknowledged that politics is a form of knowledge with its own distinctive subject matter and set of truth claims. Good student of Plato's that he was, Aristotle saw himself as turning the study of politics into a science (episteme) inasmuch as it constituted the search for a comprehensive or general explanation of some particular branch of knowledge.

Type
Political Science and Political Philosophy
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 189 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlin, Isaiah. [1958] 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. 2000. Justice Is Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1859] 1973. “Preface to the ‘Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.’” Selected Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital” The Journal of Democracy 6(January): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar