Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:40:31.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Science 400: Citations by Ph.D. Cohort and by Ph.D.-Granting Institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Hans-Dieter Klingemann ,
Bernard Grofman  and
Janet Campagna
Hans-Dieter Klingemann
Affiliation:
Freie Universitat Berlin
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Janet Campagna
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 258 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Footnotes

*

This is the second in a proposed series in “Political Science: Snapshots of a Discipline” drawing on data in the Social Science Citation Index and the APSA Biographical Directory. Planned future papers include “Endogamy and Exogamy in Political Science Hiring Practices,” “Is Anybody Out There Reading? A Gini Index of Citation Inequality in Political Science,” and “Citation is the Sincerest Form of Flattery: Citation Clique Structure in Political Science.” We are indebted to the Word Processing Center, School of Social Science, UCI, for manuscript typing. For one of us, the inspiration for this research came from Albert Somit and Joseph Tanenhaus, American Political Science: A Profile of a Discipline, New York: Atherton Press, 1964, and from a course in the sociology of science at the University of Chicago taught by Duncan MacRae.

References

Committee on Assessment of Quality Related Characteristics of Research Doctorate Programs in the United States (COBARC), 1982. An Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Cnudde, Charles. 1986. Letter PS 19 (Fall) 850–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cnudde, Charles. 1987. Letter, “A Reply to Klingemann,” PS 20 (Summer): 618–619.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, forthcoming. “Reputation, Research and Reality: The Publication Records of UK Departments of Politics.” Political Studies.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Edward S. 1987. “Perils in Citation Counting.” PS 20 (Winter): 6–7.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1986. “Ranking the Graduate Departments in the 1980s: Toward Objective Indicators.” PS 19 (Summer): 651–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1987. Letter, “More Citation Countings: Reply to Charles Cnudde.” PS 20 (Summer): 616–618.Google Scholar
Minogue, Kenneth. 1986. “Politics and the Gross Intellectual Product.” Government and Opposition. Vol. 21 No. 4: 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, Frank. 1987. “Deadwood.” PS 20 (Winter): 7–9.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan and Hibbing, John R. 1983. “What Do the New Ratings of Political Science Departments Measure?” PS 16: 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar