Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:33:13.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Knowledge and Exposure to the 2012 US Presidential Debates: Does Debate Format Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Jason Turcotte  and
R. Kirby Goidel
Jason Turcotte
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
R. Kirby Goidel
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extant literature shows a positive link between presidential debates and political knowledge, with findings strongest for low-information voters. Considering presidential debates continue to retain a mass audience, they fulfill an invaluable civic function. Less clear is whether knowledge effects hold across debate formats and agenda topics. Using an experimental method that exposes a sample of undergraduate students to the 2012 US presidential debates, this article explores variance in knowledge effects across formats and topics. We find citizens can learn about issues and candidates but debate format and agenda topics may mediate the effects. We discuss the broader democratic implications of these findings and directions for future debate research.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 449 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John H., Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential candidates ‘waltz before a blind audience?’” The American Political Science Review 83 (1): 123–41.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1960. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen E. 1996. “Know-nothings Revisited Again.” Political Behavior 18 (3): 219–33.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L., and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2001. “Presidential Debate Questions and the Public Agenda.” Communication Quarterly 49 (2): 130–41.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L., and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2004. “Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation, and Vote Choice.” Human Communication Research 30(1): 121-144.Benoit, William L., Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser. 2003. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 70 (4): 335–50.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L., McKinney, Mitchell S., and Stephenson, Michael T.. 2002. “Effects of Watching 2000 Campaign Presidential Primary Debates.” Journal of Communication 52 (2): 316–31.Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B., Vigil, Tammy, Buehler, Susan, and McDonald, Kelly. 2008. The Third Agenda in U.S. Presidential Debates: Debate Watch and Viewer Reactions, 1996-2004. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H. 1978. “Presidential Debaters – Are They Helpful to Voters?” Communication Monographs 45: 330–46.Google Scholar
Cho, Jaeho, and Choy, Syng Pom. 2011. “From Podium to Living Room: Elite Debates as an Emotional Catalyst for Citizen Communicative Engagements.” Communication Research 38 (6): 778–804.Google Scholar
Cho, Jaeho, and Ha, Yerheen. 2012. “On the Communicative Underpinnings of Campaign Effects: Presidential Debates, Citizen Communication, and Polarization in Evaluations of Candidates.” Political Communication 29: 184–204.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2008. The Presidency in the Era of 24-Hour News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen A., and Holbrook, Thomas M.. 2001. “Knowing Versus Caring: The Role of Affect and Cognition in Political Perceptions.” Political Psychology 22 (1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2003. “The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited.” The Journal of Politics 65 (2): 559–571.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna. 2008. “Markets, Ownership, and the Quality of Campaign News Coverage.” The Journal of Politics 70 (4): 1193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Henderson, Michael. 2010. “Political Issues and the Dynamics of Vote Choice in 2008.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20 (2): 241–69.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1999. “Political Learning from Presidential Debates.” Political Behavior 21 (1): 67–89.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2002. “Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap.” Political Communication 19 (4): 437–54.Google Scholar
Jackson-Beeck, Marilyn, and Meadow, Robert G.. 1979. “The Triple Agenda of Presidential Debates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (2): 173–80.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Birdsell, David S.. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Just, Marion R., Crigler, Ann N., Alger, Dean E., Cook, Timothy E., Kern, Montague, and West, Darrell M.. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaid, Linda L., Mitchell, McKinney S., and Tedesco, John C.. 2000. Civic Dialogue in the 1996 Presidential Campaign: Candidates, Media, and Public Voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Lang, Gladys E., and Lang, Kurt. 1978. “Immediate and Delayed Responses to a Carter-Ford Debate: Assessing Public Opinion.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (3): 322–41.Google Scholar
Lanoue, David J. 1992. “One That Made a Difference: Cognitive Consistency, Political Knowledge, and the 1980 Presidential Debate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 168–84.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, Jack M., Bybee, Carl R., and Durall, Jean A.. 1982. “Equivalence of Informed Political Participation: The 1976 Presidential Debates as a Source of Influence.” Communication Research 6 (4): 463–87.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., and MacKuen, Michael. 1979. “Learning About the Candidates: The 1976 Presidential Debates.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (3): 326–46.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2005. “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 577–92.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2012. “Who Watches Presidential Debates? Measurement Problems in Campaign Effects Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (2): 350–63.Google Scholar
Schrott, Peter R., and Lanoue, David J.. 2013. “The Power and Limitations of Televised Presidential Debates: Assessing the Real Impact of Candidate Performance on Public Opinion and Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies (forthcoming). Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jelectstud.7013.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Robert A., and King, Erika G.. 1994. “Prestige Newspaper Coverage of Foreign Affairs in the 1990 Congressional Campaigns.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 71 (3): 652–64.Google Scholar
Zhu, Jian-Hua, Milavsky, Ronald J., and Biswas, Rahul. 1994. “Do Televised Debates Affect Image Perception More Than Issue Knowledge? A Study of the First 1992 Presidential Debate.” Human Communication Research 20 (3): 302–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar