No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pay to Play? How Reducing APSA Division Fees Increases Graduate Student Participation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2021
Abstract
In 2017, the American Political Science Association (APSA) Committee on the Status of Graduate Students in the Profession launched an initiative to lower the cost of Division (i.e., organized section) membership for students to promote graduate students’ professional development and to advance Division interests. This article assesses the effect of this intervention on Division membership. Using APSA membership data, we find that almost two thirds of Divisions that charged fees in 2017 reduced or eliminated student fees between 2017 and 2019, nearly halving the average student dues (i.e., from $11.57 in 2017 to $5.84 in 2019). As a result, average student membership increased by more than 300% in Divisions that reduced fees (i.e., from 79.5 in 2017 to 248.7 in 2019), compared to a marginal 30% increase in those that did not reduce fees. These outcomes of the initiative support additional efforts to reduce the costs of APSA participation for graduate students.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
American Political Science Association. 2004. “Organized Section Handbook.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Memos/handbook.pdf.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2011. “Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Task%20Force%20Reports/TF_21st%20Century_AllPgs_webres90.pdf.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2020. “Committee on the Status of Graduate Students in the Profession.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. www.apsanet.org/gradstudentstatus.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Card, David. 1985. “Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (4): 648–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brintnall, Michael. 1991. “Organized Sections in APSA: A Status Report.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (3): 559–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500051556.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Michelle D. 2015. “Reconsidering the Scholarly Conference for the Contemporary Academic.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (2): 315–18. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514002248.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, Bailey R., Neuner, Fabian G., Perera, Isabel M., and Slaughter, Christine M.. 2021. “Replication Data for: Pay to Play? How Reducing APSA Division Fees Increases Graduate student Participation.” Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X0NO0K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Devashree, and Waismel-Manor, Israel. 2006. “Network in Progress: A Conference Primer for Graduate Students.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (3): 485–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060720.Google Scholar
Losco, Joseph. 1998. “Whither Intellectual Diversity in American Political Science? The Case of APSA and Organized Sections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 31 (4): 836–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/420729.Google Scholar
Fairbanks et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix
PDF
143.6 KB