Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:07:20.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obama and the Economy in 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2009

Michael S. Lewis-Beck  and
Richard Nadeau
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Richard Nadeau
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We believe the economy was much on voters' minds in the 2008 presidential election. More formally, a traditional economic retrospective voting theory—electors disapprove of past economic conditions and vote against the government—should serve well as an explanation of Obama's victory (Fiorina 1981; Lewis-Beck 1988, 34).

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 479 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philp E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Nadeau, Richard, and Elias, Angelo. 2008. “Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Paldam, Martin. 2000. “Economic Voting: An Introduction.” Electoral Studies 19 (2–3): 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2007. “Economic Models of Voting.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Dalton, Russell and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 518–37.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2009. “Macroeconomics and the 2008 Election.” The Political Economist: Newsletter of the Section on Political Economy, American Political Science Association 11 (1): 10–14.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2001. “National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 63: 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark. 1984. “The Voter as Juror: Attributing Responsibility for Economic Conditions.” Political Behavior 6 (3): 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J., and Grant, J. Tobin. 2002. “An Alternative Model of Economic Voting: Evidence form the 2000 Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (4): 805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (3): 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar