Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:31:46.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Navigating Fieldwork as an Outsider: Observations from Interviewing Police Officers in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Suzanne E. Scoggins
Suzanne E. Scoggins*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Fieldwork in Political Science: Encountering Challenges and Crafting Solutions
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 394 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Converse, Jean M., and Schuman, Howard. 1974. Conversations at Random: Survey Research as Interviewers See It. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Sonya C., and Buckle, Jennifer L.. 2009. “The Space Between: On being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1): 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellawell, David. 2006. “Inside-Out: Analysis of the Insider-Outsider Concept as a Heuristic Device to Develop Reflexivity in Students doing Qualitative Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (4): 483–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herod, Andrew. 1999. “Reflections on Interviewing Foreign Elites: Praxis, Positionality, Validity, and the Cult of the Insider.” Geoforum 30: 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Rick H., Harris, Monica J., and Judd, Charles M.. 2002. Research Methods in Social Science, 7th Edition. Fort Worth, TX: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Manion, Melanie. 2010. “A Survey of Research on Chinese Politics: What Have We Learned?” In Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and Field Strategies, eds. Carlson, Allen, Gallagher, Mary, Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Manion, Melanie, 235–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merriam, Sharan B., Johnson-Bailey, Juanita, Lee, Ming-Yeh, Kee, Youngwha, Ntseane, Gabo, and Muhamad, Mazanah. 2001. “Power and Positionality: Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status within and across Cultures.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 20 (5): 405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1972. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (1): 9–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naples, Nancy A. 1996. “A Feminist Revisiting of the Insider/Outsider Debate: The ‘Outsider Phenomenon’ in Rural Iowa.” Quantitative Sociology 19 (1): 83–106.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Kevin J. 2006. “Discovery, Research (Re)design, and Theory Building.” In Doing Fieldwork in China, ed. Heimer, Maria and Thøgersen, Stig, 27–41. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
SolingerDorothy, J Dorothy, J. 2006. “Interviewing Chinese People: From High-Level Officials to the Unemployed.” In Doing Fieldwork in China, ed. Heimer, Maria and Thøgersen, Stig, 153–67. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i PressGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Lily L. 2010 “Quantitative Research and Issues of Political Sensitivity in Rural China.” In Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and Field Strategies, edited by Carlson, Allen, Gallagher, Mary, Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Manion, Melanie, 246–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar