Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:13:39.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Conditions, Strategic Politicians, and U.S. Congressional Elections: Using the Generic Vote to Forecast the 2006 House and Senate Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2006

Alan I. Abramowitz
Alan I. Abramowitz
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the 2006 midterm election fast approaching, Democrats' chances of regaining control of the House of Representatives remain unclear. On the one hand, national political conditions appear to be more favorable for Democrats than at any time since the Republican takeover of the House in 1994. A pickup of only 15 seats would give Democrats control of the House in 2007 and, since the end of World War II the average midterm seat loss for the president's party is 24 seats. Moreover, when the president's approval rating is below 50%, the average midterm seat loss is 38 seats and, according to data compiled by pollingreport.com, George W. Bush's average approval rating during the month of June was only 37%.

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 863 - 866
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1984. “National Issues, Strategic Politicians, and Voting Behavior in the 1980 and 1982 Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 710–21.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1986. “Determinants of the Outcomes of U.S. Senate Elections.” Journal of Politics 48 (2): 433–9.Google Scholar
Born, Richard. 1986. “Strategic Politicians and Unresponsive Voters.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 599–612.Google Scholar
Cook, Charlie. 2006. “A Shortage of Top-Tier Challengers.” National Journal Online: www.nationaljournal.com. April 1.
Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 773–93.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lublin, David I. 1994. “Quality, Not Quantity: Strategic Politicians in U.S. Senate Elections, 1952–1990.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 228–41.Google Scholar