Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:17:09.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Most Liberal Senator”? Analyzing and Interpreting Congressional Roll Calls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

Joshua D. Clinton ,
Simon Jackman  and
Doug Rivers
Joshua D. Clinton
Affiliation:
Princeton University Assistant professor in the department of politics at Princeton University. He has recently authored articles on the analysis of roll call data in the American Journal of Political Science and Political Analysis.
Simon Jackman
Affiliation:
Stanford University Associate professor in the department of political science and, by courtesy, the department of statistics, and director of the Political Science Computational Laboratory. He has recently authored articles on the analysis of roll call data in the American Political Science Review and Political Analysis.
Doug Rivers
Affiliation:
Stanford University Professor in the department of political science, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and senior fellow, and research fellow, at the Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scoring lawmakers based upon the votes they cast while serving in Congress is both commonplace and politically consequential. However, scoring legislators' voting records is not without its problems—even when performed by organizations without a specific policy agenda. A telling illustration of the impact that these scores have on political debate recently arose in the 2004 Democratic presidential primaries.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 805 - 811
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blomquist Brian. 2004. “Survey: Kerry a Flaming Liberal,” New York Post, Feb. 28, 2.Google Scholar
Clausen Aage. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Clinton Joshua D., Simon Jackman, and Douglas Rivers. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Voting: A Unified Approach.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355–370.Google Scholar
Cohen Richard E. 2004. “How They Measured Up.” National Journal. 39 (Feb 27): 613–619.Google Scholar
Dinan Stephen. 2004. “List Says Kerry Top Senate Liberal; Missed Votes Boosted Credentials,” Washington Times, Feb 28, A2.Google Scholar
Erikson Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright. 2001. “Voters, Candidates and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered. Seventh edition, eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Federal Document Clearing House [FDCH]. 2004. “Democratic Presidential Candidates Participate in Debate Sponsored by CBS News and the New York Times.” In FDCH Political Transcripts, February 29, 2004. Academic Universe. Princeton: Lexis-Nexis.Google Scholar
Guarnino David R., and Noelle Straub. 2004. “Liberal Label Sticks; GOP Jumps on Kerry Over Senate Ranking,” Boston Herald, Feb. 28, 16.Google Scholar
Jackson John E., and John Kingdon. 1992. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 805–823.Google Scholar
Kady Martin II. 2004. “Voting on the Run.” CQ Weekly 62: 22–23.Google Scholar
Kingdon John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. Third Edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel Keith. 2003. “The Coefficient of Party Influence.” Political Analysis 11: 95–103.Google Scholar
Levitt Stephen. 1996. “How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology.” American Economic Review 86: 425–441.Google Scholar
Martinez Gebe. 2004. “GOP Pans for Political Gold in Kerry's Voting Record.” CQ Weekly 62: 458–465.Google Scholar
McCarty Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.” American Political Science Review 95: 673–687.Google Scholar
Poole Keith, and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder James M., Jr. 1992. “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 319–345.Google Scholar
Snyder James M., Jr., and Tim Groseclose. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 187–205.Google Scholar