Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:23:39.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilization and Reform: Political Communication Policy Under Gorbachev

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Ellen Mickiewicz
Ellen Mickiewicz*
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mikhail Gorbachev's program for the renovation of the Soviet political system is a reform of considerable magnitude. The sequencing of policies provides important information about the nature of the Soviet system and the dynamics of change, and in that sequence, communications policies shifted earliest and most radically. Virtually from the beginning of Gorbachev's tenure in power, an observer of Soviet politics could detect in the use of the media the operation of a key mechanism in effecting major change. Glasnost, the new openness and public discussion, is a media phenomenon. The new role accorded the media is in many ways a revolutionary one. The expanded functions of the media in the Gorbachev administration require them to precipitate institutional change in the Soviet political system. Mobilization will be temporary if there is insufficient structural change to support it, and the media system itself has become a principal factor in breaking down dysfunctional institutions inherited from previous regimes, strengthening weak institutions (such as the Soviets) and developing new types of institutions. As a consequence of this dynamic, systemic change in the media system precedes other large-scale change, and, in fact, before any major economic and political reforms of the Gorbachev administration were launched, extensive changes in the system of political communication had been made.

Type
Glasnost, Perestroiko, and Novoye Myshleniye: Reform in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 199 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreeva, Nina. March 13, 1988. Ne mogu postupatsia printsipami. Sovetskaia Rossia.Google Scholar
Arutuinian, Iu. V., and Bromlei, Iu. V. 1986. Sotsialno-kulturny oblik sovetskikh natsii. Moscow.Google Scholar
Bochevarov, G. N. March 14, 1987. Uchit nenavisti? Izvestia.Google Scholar
Bower, Robert T. 1973. Television and the Public, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Byla, est i budet. 1988. Televidenie/Radioveshchame, No. 11, p. 36.Google Scholar
Chebrikov, V. January 8, 1987. Pravda.Google Scholar
Dzenitis, J. November 19, 1988. Nuzhny knostruktivnye predlozheniia a ne ultimatumy. Pravda.Google Scholar
Fedotova, L., Kapeliush, la., and Sazonov, V. 1985. Televidenie v nebolshom gorode. In Sabashnikova, E. S., ed., Televidenie vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Moscow.Google Scholar
Fein, Esther. October 11, 1988. Latvians Extending a Hand to Outsiders in Their Midst. New York Times.Google Scholar
Fomicheva, I. D. 1988. “O Rezultatakh ekspertnogo oprosa po teme ‘SMI, sotsiologia, perestroika.’” Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria 10, Zhurnalistika, No. 3, 1988: 84–88.Google Scholar
Gabiani, A. A., Mushkudiani, N. A., and Mylnikova, O. B. 1986. Normativno-tsennostnaia propaganda i puti povyshenia ee effektivnosti. Tbilisi, USSR.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, M. September 25, 1988. Na novom etape perestroiki. Pravda.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide, 2d edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Guboglo, M. N. 1988. Sovershenstvovanie natsionalnykh otnoshenii v SSSR v svete XXVII sezda KPSS. Moscow,Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald R. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mickiewiecz, Ellen. 1981. Media and the Russian Public. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mickiewicz, Ellen. 1983. Feedback, Surveys, and Soviet Communication Theory. Journal of Communication, 33:97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickiewicz, Ellen. 1988. Split Signals: Television and Politics in the Soviet Union. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikhailov, B. May 29, 1988. “Ostorozhno: sensatsia!” Pravda.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Dempsey, Glenn R. 1987. What Moves Public Opinion? American Political Science Review, 81:23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polskaia, L. April 23, 1986. Nashi kamery vkliucheny. Literaturnaia Gazeta.Google Scholar
Printsipy perestroiki: revoliutsionnost myshlenia i deistvii. April 5, 1988. Pravda, p. 2.Google Scholar
Quinn-Judge, Peter. April 27, 1988. Leadership tussle leaves Gorbachev rival down, but not out. Christian Science Monitor.Google Scholar
Soviet Philosophers Stop Runaway Train. No. 39, 1988. Moscow News, pp. 2–9.Google Scholar
Televidenie—mnogonatsionalnoi auditorii. No. 37, 1988. Govorit i pokazyvaet Moskva, p. 19 Google Scholar
Zapreshchaetsia zalyvat dalshe vsekh. No. 8: 1988. Zhurnalist, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
perestroika, Zhurnalistikai. No. 3, 1988. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, seria 10, Zhurnalistika, pp. 62–78.Google Scholar