Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T17:01:10.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing Public Support for Transgender Rights through Superordinate LGBT+ Rights Framing: Evidence from a US Survey Experiment on Transgender Participation in Sports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2025

Sam Whitt
Affiliation:
High Point University, USA
Alixandra B. Yanus
Affiliation:
High Point University, USA
Mark Setzler
Affiliation:
High Point University, USA
Brian McDonald
Affiliation:
High Point University, USA
Gordon Ballingrud
Affiliation:
High Point University, USA
Tyler Coleman
Affiliation:
High Point University, USA

Abstract

We consider how LGBT+ legal rights frameworks, broadly construed, can be used to bolster support within the general public for transgender subgroup rights. Our research is informed by theoretical perspectives on appeals to superordinate identities to reduce prejudice. Based on a survey experiment in the United States, we find that framing a salient transgender advocacy issue—transgender participation in sports—within a broader LGBT+ legal rights framework increases public support for transgender inclusion in sports. There is a nearly 10 percentage-point increase in support, including among partisan Republicans, when transgender rights in sports are preceded by priming and framing around the more general LGBT+ rights struggle. Our results underscore the importance of broader LGBT+ rights advocacy to public acceptance of the transgender community.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Eric, and Travers, Ann, eds. 2017. Transgender Athletes in Competitive Sport. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth. 2002Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Amy, and Jones, Philip Edward. 2021. “Experience with Discrimination, Perceptions of Difference, and the Importance of Gender Conformity on Support for Transgender Rights.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 9 (5):1051–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Derrick. 2004. Silent Covenants: Brown v. Board of Education and the Unfulfilled Hopes for Racial Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David, and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, Marianne, Hinton, Jordan DX, and Anderson, Joel R.. 2019. “A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Religion and Attitudes toward Transgender and Gender-Variant People.” International Journal of Transgenderism 20 (1): 2138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, George, and Pickett, Andrew. 2018. “Trans Prejudice in Sport: Differences from LGB Prejudice, the Influence of Gender, and Changes over Time.” Sex Roles 78 (3–4): 220–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferez, Sylvain. 2012. “From Women’s Exclusion to Gender Institution: A Brief History of the Sexual Categorization Process within Sport.” International Journal of the History of Sport 29 (2): 272–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Andrew, Haider-Markel, Donald, Lewis, Daniel, Miller, Patrick, Tadlock, Barry, and Taylor, Jami. 2018. “Transgender Prejudice Reduction and Opinions on Transgender Rights: Results from a Mediation Analysis on Experimental Data.” Research & Politics 5 (1):17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Andrew, Haider-Markel, Donald, Lewis, Daniel, Miller, Patrick, Tadlock, Barry, and Taylor, Jami. 2020. “Public Attitudes about Transgender Participation in Sports: The Roles of Gender, Gender Identity Conformity, and Sports Fandom.” Sex Roles 83 (5–6): 382–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomila, Robin. 2021. “Logistic or Linear? Estimating Causal Effects of Experimental Treatments on Binary Outcomes Using Regression Analysis.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 150 (4): 700–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harcourt, Jay, ed. 2013. Current Issues in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Brian, and Michelson, Melissa. 2020. “Using Experiments to Understand Public Attitudes towards Transgender Rights.” In Body Politics, edited by Brown, Nadia E. and Gershon, Sarah Allen, 152–60. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, Miles, and Greenland, Katy. 2000. “Intergroup Conflict.” International Journal of Psychology 35 (2):136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Jordan, de la Piedad Garcia, Xochitl, Kaufmann, Leah, Koc, Yasin, and Anderson, Joel. 2022. “A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review of Identity Centrality among LGBTQ Groups: An Assessment of Psychosocial Correlates.” Journal of Sex Research 59 (5): 568–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalla, Joshua, and Broockman, David. 2020. “Reducing Exclusionary Attitudes through Interpersonal Conversation: Evidence from Three Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 410–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Daniel, Flores, Andrew, Haider-Markel, Donald, Miller, Patrick, Tadlock, Barry, and Taylor, Jami. 2017. “Degrees of Acceptance: Variation in Public Attitudes toward Segments of the LGBT Community.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (4): 861–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Daniel, Flores, Andrew, Haider-Markel, Donald, Miller, Patrick, and Taylor, Jami. 2022. “Transitioning Opinion? Assessing the Dynamics of Public Attitudes toward Transgender Rights.” Public Opinion Quarterly 86 (2): 343–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClearen, Jennifer. 2023. “‘If You Let Me Play’: Girls’ Empowerment and Transgender Exclusion in Sports.” Feminist Media Studies 23 (4): 1361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony. 2019. Organizing for Transgender Rights: Collective Action, Group Development, and the Rise of a New Social Movement. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Jack. 2023. “Rural Identity and LGBT Public Opinion in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly 87 (4): 956–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velasco, Kristopher. 2023. “Transnational Backlash and the Deinstitutionalization of Liberal Norms: LGBT+ Rights in a Contested World.” American Journal of Sociology 128 (5): 13811429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Michael, Mummendey, Amélie, and Waldzus, Sven. 2008. “Superordinate Identities and Intergroup Conflict: The Ingroup Projection Model.” European Review of Social Psychology 18 (1): 331–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Sam, Yanus, Alixandra B., Setzler, Mark, McDonald, Brian, Ballingrud, Gordon, and Coleman, Tyler. 2024. “Replication Data for: Increasing Public Support for Transgender Rights through Superordinate LGBT + Rights Framing: Evidence from a U.S. Survey Experiment on Transgender Participation in Sports.” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.7910/DVN/LDRXW2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Whitt et al. supplementary material

Whitt et al. supplementary material
Download Whitt et al. supplementary material(File)
File 181.8 KB