Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:23:09.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Cultural Orientations Create Shifting National Security Coalitions on Nuclear Weapons and Terrorist Threats in the American Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

Joseph T. Ripberger
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Kerry G. Herron
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma

Extract

Scholars have used cultural theory (CT) to explain risk perceptions and opinion formation across an impressive array of public issues, ranging from environmental, regulatory, and energy policy to public health and economics. Although disparate, all these issues concern domestic policies. This article breaks with this trend by exploring the extent to which CT can help scholars better understand public beliefs about national security. Of critical importance in debates about national security are perceptions of individual versus collective threat and the appropriate role of authoritative institutions in protecting society from these threats. Because CT provides a framework that explicitly addresses these dimensions, national security issues provide an illuminating canvas for evaluating the theory's explanatory utility.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel Abraham. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Arian, Asher, and Shamir, Michal. 1983. “The Primarily Political Functions of the Left–Right Continuum.” Comparative Politics 15: 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John E., Hagen, Michael G., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1991. “Ideological Reasoning.” In Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. 141–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25: 617–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Politics.” In Ideology and Discontent, 206–61. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1970. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Barrie and Rockliff.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J., and Thompson, Fred. 1997. “Culture and Environment in the Pacific Northwest.” American Political Science Review 91: 885–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Kerry G., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. 2006. Critical Masses and Critical Choices: Evolving Public Opinion on Nuclear Weapons, Terrorism, and Security. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark. 1987. “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review 81: 1099–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John, Braman, Donald, Kahan, Dan M., and Slovic, Paul. 2011. “The Cultural Orientation of Mass Public Opinion.” PS: Political Science & Politics, this issue.Google Scholar
Grendstad, Gunnar, and Selle, Per. 2000. “Cultural Myths of Human and Physical Nature: Integrated or Separated?Risk Analysis 20: 2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Herron, Kerry G.. 2009. “Rock and a Hard Place: Public Willingness to Trade Civil Rights and Liberties for Greater Security.” Politics & Policy 37: 1095–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Herron, Kerry G., and Ripberger, Joseph T.. 2011. “Cultural Theory and National Security: The Role of Cultural Orientations in Americans' Preferences for Security and Nuclear Deterrence.” Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1815286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Silva, Carol L., and Song, Geoboo. 2011. “Political Ideology, Cultural Orientation, and Vaccination Policy Preferences.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Smith, Walter K.. 1994. “Ideology, Culture, and Risk Perception.” In Politics, Policy, and Culture, eds. Coyle, Dennis J. and Ellis, Richard J.. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Braman, Donald, Cohen, Geoffrey L., Gastil, John, and Slovic, Paul. 2010. “Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition.” Law and Human Behavior 34: 501–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarevas, Louis. 2002. “The ‘Essential Domino’ of Military Operations: American Public Opinion and the Use of Force.” International Studies Perspectives 3: 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy on the Decline and Revival of the Western Society. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lodge, Martin, Wegrich, Kai, and McElroy, Gail. 2010. “Dodgy Kebabs Everywhere? Variety of Worldviews and Regulatory Change.” Public Administration 88: 247–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkin, Jesse, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1991. “Why the Traditional Distinction Between Public and Private Goods Should Be Abandoned.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 3: 355–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, Kristy E. H., Carlisle, Juliet E., and Smith, Eric R. A. N.. 2009. “The Relationship between Cultural Values and Political Ideology, and the Role of Political Knowledge.” Political Psychology 30: 2742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John. 2006. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin, and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ripberger, Joseph T., Rabovsky, Thomas M., and Herron, Kerry G.. Forthcoming. “Public Opinion and Nuclear Zero: A Domestic Constraint on Ditching the Bomb.” Politics & Policy.Google Scholar
Ripberger, Joseph T., Song, Geoboo, Nowlin, Matthew C., Jones, Michael D., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. 2011. “Reconsidering the Relationship between Cultural Theory, Political Ideology, and Political Knowledge.” Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1861213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1986. “Interrelationships of Political Ideology and Public Opinion.” In Political Psychology, ed. Hermann, Margaret E., 6296. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swaney, James A. 1995. “Social Economics and Risk Analysis.” Review of Social Economy 53: 575–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael, Ellis, Richard J., and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Verweij, Marco. 1995. “Cultural Theory and the Study of International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24: 87111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verweij, Marco. 2011. Clumsy Solutions for a Wicked World: How to Improve Global Governance. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. “Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation.” American Political Science Review 81: 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron, and Dake, Karl. 1990. “Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why?Daedalus 119: 4160.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar