Article contents
Gaming Arizona: Public Money and Shifting Candidate Strategies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2008
Extract
Since public election financing was first implemented during the wave of post-Watergatereforms, the burning question has been, “does it work?” Evaluations of public financing havefocused on its primary objectives, which are designed to address familiar grievances:Elections are too expensive and not competitive enough. Corporate PACs and other “specialinterests” contribute disproportionately to incumbents because they are interested inpurchasing influence. Candidates must devote so much time to fundraising that little is leftfor other campaign tasks. Lost in these considerations, however, is the fact that mandatedfinancial parity changes the strategic environment candidates function in, altering theirdecision making and potentially changing the nature of elections. As fully subsidizedelections gain increasing ubiquity in the United States, reformers must decide whether thisis a cost worth bearing.
- Type
- Features
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008
References
- 5
- Cited by