Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:03:58.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forecasting US Presidential Elections Using Economic and Noneconomic Fundamentals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Christopher Wlezien
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: US Presidential Election Forecasting
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2014. The 2012 Campaign and Timeline of Presidential Elections. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012a. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012b. “The Objective and Subjective Economy and the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (4): 620–24.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, Franklin, Mark N., and Twiggs, Daniel. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior 19: 717.Google Scholar