Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:15:05.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluations of the 2014 Midterm Election Forecasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2015

James E. Campbell ,
Alan I. Abramowitz ,
Joseph Bafumi ,
Robert S. Erikson ,
Christopher Wlezien ,
Michael S. Lewis-Beck ,
Charles Tien ,
Benjamin Highton ,
Eric McGhee  and
John Sides
James E. Campbell
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, SUNY, guest editor
Alan I. Abramowitz
Affiliation:
Emory University
Joseph Bafumi
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Christopher Wlezien
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Charles Tien
Affiliation:
Hunter College, CUNY
Benjamin Highton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Eric McGhee
Affiliation:
Public Policy Institute of California
John Sides
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Evaluations of the 2014 Midterm Election Forecasts
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 295 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brier, Glenn W. 1950. “Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability.” Monthly Weather Review 78: 1–3.Google Scholar
Highton, Benjamin, McGhee, Eric, and Sides, John. 2014. “Election Fundamentals and Polls Favor the Republicans.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (4): 786–8.Google Scholar
Sides, John. 2014a. “What’s the Value of Early Senate Polls?” The Monkey Cage, July 10. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/07/10/whats-the-value-of-early-senate-polls/.Google Scholar
Sides, John. 2014b. “Final Forecast: Republicans Have a 98% Chance of Taking the Senate.” The Monkey Cage, November 4. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/11/04/final-forecast-republicans-have-a-98-chance-of-taking-the-senate/ Google Scholar
Sides, John. 2014c. “Election Lab on Track to Forecast 35 of 36 Senate Races Correctly.” The Monkey Cage, November 5: Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/11/05/election-lab-on-track-to-forecast-35-of-36-senate-races-correctly/ Google Scholar
Wasserman, David. 2014. “2014 National House Popular Vote Tracker.” Available at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjYj9mXElO_QdHVsbnNNdXRoaUE5QThHclNWaTgzb2c&usp=drive_web#gid=0.Google Scholar