Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:32:59.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation Standards for a Slow-Moving Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Everything I have published, apart from some ghost-written school speeches for my children, I have written as a social scientist. Having persuaded myself that I had discovered something worth reporting, I have attempted to persuade others that it was worth knowing. I have taken this to be consistent with the spirit of science, perhaps naively; a spirit encompassing, among other things, the value of public argument based on publicly reproducible evidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 464 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, Angus,Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs! New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewald, William G.,Thursby, Jerry G., and Anderson, Richard G. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking Project.” American Economic Review 76:587–603.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert,Hoffmann, Paul J., and O'Hara, Rosemary. 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus Among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review 54:406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar