Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:41:15.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Electoral Connection in the 99th Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

Timothy E. Cook
Timothy E. Cook*
Affiliation:
Williams College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Participant observation has provided some of our most impressive insights into the contemporary Congress. In particular, two scholars relied upon this method for results that must be regarded as shaping our current paradigm on Congress and its members: David Mayhew, who, six years after serving as an APSA Congressional Fellow, published his essay, Congress: The Electoral Connection (1974), and Richard Fenno, who traveled with representatives and senators in order to assess how members of Congress interact with their constituents and the impact of those interactions upon their performances in Washington in Home Style (1978) and its companion volume on the Senate (1982).

Despite the influence of these works, some ambiguities remained when I began my stint as a Congressional Fellow in the fall of 1984. For one thing, Mayhew and Fenno had reached different conclusions regarding the impact of the need to run for reelection. Mayhew asserted that congressional behavior and congressional outcomes could be explained solely by the goal of getting reelected; on the other hand, Fenno contended that members could establish separate “home styles” and “Washington styles,” as leeway in the latter increased with more successful presentations of self back home. Likewise, whereas Mayhew made no distinction between the strength of the electoral incentive for representatives and senators, Fenno argued that having longer terms than representatives provided much more temptation for senators to do something besides merely run for reelection. A second ambiguity was that most of Mayhew's and Fenno's fieldwork was accomplished in the early to mid 1970s, before the sea-change in American politics best symbolized by Ronald Reagan's election and the dramatic shifts in policy and in political style that ensued (see especially Edsall, 1984; Chubb and Peterson, 1985). While studies suggest that congressional decision-making has changed only slightly in the Reagan years (e.g., Smith, 1985), the altered electoral environment may have produced far-reaching changes in how the electoral connection shapes Congress.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , Winter 1986 , pp. 16 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bond, Jon R., Covington, Cary and Fleisher, Richard. 1985. Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics 47: 510–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, David, Cooper, Joseph and Hurley, Patricia. 1979. The Decline of Party in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1968. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4: 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, Thomas. 1981. The Two Arenas of Congress. In Cooper, Joseph and Mackenzie, Calvin, eds., The House at Work. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Thomas and Sundquist, James L.. 1985. The New Two-Party System. In Chubb, and Peterson, (1985), pp. 33–67.Google Scholar
Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul, eds. 1985. The New Direction in American Politics. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas B. 1984. The New Politics of Inequality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Eubank, Robert B. 1985. Incumbent Effects on Individual-Level Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections: A Decade of Exaggeration. Journal of Politics 47: 958–967.10.2307/2131221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1982. The United States Senate: A Bicameral Perspective. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael. 1980. The New Senate: Liberal Influence on a Conservative Institution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Granat, Diane. 1983. Democratic Caucus Renewed as Forum for Policy Questions. CQ Weekly Reports 41: 2115–2119.Google Scholar
Gurwitt, Rob. 1985. GOP Aims to Elude Senate Takeover Bid in ′86. CQ Weekly Report 43: 1427–1432.Google Scholar
Hess, Stephen, forthcoming. The Ultimate Insiders. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara. 1981. Congressional Elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1970. The Minority Party in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J. 1981. The House and the Senate in a New Congress. In Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J., eds., The New Congress. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas, Malbin, Michael, Schick, Allen and Bibby, John. 1984. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1984–85. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Reichley, A. James. 1985. The Rise of National Parties. In Chubb, and Peterson, (1985), pp. 175–200.Google Scholar
Roberts, Steven V. 1985. A Most Important Man on Capitol Hill. New York Times Magazine (September 22, 1985): 44 ff.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1985. Changing Patterns of Decisionmaking in Congress. In Chubb, and Peterson, (1985), pp. 203–233.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. and Deering, Christopher J.. 1984. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Martin. 1985. Election Proximity and Senatorial Roll Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 29: 96–111.10.2307/2111213CrossRefGoogle Scholar