Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:53:03.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eastern Europe: Is the Party Over?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Valerie Bunce
Valerie Bunce*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Absolute systems are strong as long as they are absolute. When they begin to reform, they are lost. Yet they cannot avoid reform, or they will explode.

Milovan Djilas

It is easy to make a strong case for economic and political reforms in Eastern Europe. First, this is what Mikhail Gorbachev wants, and what a Soviet leader wants carries special weight in the bloc. Second, it is clear that socialist economics does not work, especially in Eastern Europe. It is not just that four of these states—Romania, Poland, Hungary and Yugoslavia—have suffered an actual decline in their standard of living since 1980; it is also that there has been a longterm decline throughout the region in capital and labor productivity. Finally, the political future of the region is mortgaged as well. Many of these parties, most notably in Hungary, Poland and Yugoslavia, can be termed mere shadows of their former Leninist selves. What is a communist party, after all, if it cannot manage the economy, agree on policies or control the public?

If the pressures for reform are great, however, so are the pressures against reform, and for many of the same reasons. Faltering economies, divided parties, nervous privileged interests and angry, impatient publics are hardly the stuff out of which a reform coalition can be cobbled. This is the lesson of Poland from 1956 to the present (Bunce, 1989b). Second, even if such a coalition could somehow be constructed, there is no guarantee that reforms would solve the problems of socialism. Indeed, they could make matters worse.

Type
Glasnost, Perestroiko, and Novoye Myshleniye: Reform in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 233 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1989a. Forthcoming. “Soviet Decline as a Regional Hegemon. Gorbachev and Eastern Europe.” Eastern European Politics and Societies.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1989b. “Why Some Rebel and Others Comply: Poland, Eastern Europe and Theories of Revolution.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1985. “The Empire Strikes Back: The Evolution of Eastern Europe from a Soviet Asset to a Soviet Liability.” International Organization, 39:3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csanadi, Maria. 1989. “Party-State Interlocking Directorates: Economic and Political Decision-Making in Hungary.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Dawisha, Karen. 1988. Eastern Europe, Gorbachev and Reform: The Great Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dix, Robert. 1983. “The Varieties of Revolution.” Comparative Politics, 5:281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Jerry. 1988. Russia and the West: Gorbachev and the Politics of Reform. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. C. 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology, 9:220–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Michael T. 1987. “Gorbachev Alludes to Czech Invasion.” New York Times, April 12.Google Scholar
Krejci, Jaroslav. 1983. Great Revolutions Compared: The Search for a Theory. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Lewin, Moshe. 1988. The Gorbachev Phenomenon: A Historical Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maximov, Vladimir. 1979. “The Russian People and the West.” In Urban, G. R., ed., Communist Reformation. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Mylnar, Zdenek. 1979. “August, 1968.” In Urban, G. R., ed., Communist Reformation. New York: St. Martin's, pp. 116–143.Google Scholar
Pakulski, Jan. 1986. “Legitimacy and Mass Compliance: Reflections on Max Weber and Soviet-Type Societies.” British Journal of Political Science, 16:35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pravda, Alex. 1981. “East-West Interdependence and the Social Compact in Eastern Europe.” In Bornstein, Morris, Gitelman, Zvi and Zimmerman, William, eds., East-West Relations and the Future of Eastern Europe. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
“Rech' tovarishcha Gorbacheva M.S.” (Speech of Comrade M. S. Gorbachev). April 11, 1987.Google Scholar
Reddaway, Peter. August 18, 1988. “Resisting Gorbachev.” New York Review of Books, 35:36–41.Google Scholar
Sadikov, V. 1966. “Plan i interes” (Plan and Interests). Izvestiia, March 13.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Hugh. 1962. Eastern Europe Between the Wars. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1982. “Rentier State and Shi'a Islam in the Iranian Revolution.” Theory and Society. 2:265–283.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Vazhnyi politicheskii zavet'.” December 14, 1985. Pravda: 5.Google Scholar
Zaslavaskaya, Tatiana. 1986. “Taktike peremen.” Izvestiia, April 18.Google Scholar
Zupanov, Josip. 1982. Marginalije o drustvenaj krizi (Marginalization with Respect to the Social Crisis). Zagreb: Globus.Google Scholar