Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:00:40.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

E. E. Schattschneider: A Bibliographic Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Russell D. Murphy
Russell D. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Wesleyan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

E. E. Schattschneider spent his professional career at Wesleyan University, an institution that prides itself in being aggressively anti-bureaucratic. Given the age we live in, there is doubtless merit in this stance. But there are costs as well. I say this because when asked to provide a bibliographic listing of Schattschneider's publications, I quickly learned that the written record, so essential to any well functioning bureaucracy, was a sometime thing at the University. There was no official file, I was told, either in the central administration or in the University Archives, that contained information on Schattschneider's career at Wesleyan.

But Wesleyan was also a small place during Schattschneider's years—in 1930, the year Schattschneider joined the faculty, the University graduated 93 seniors. And being a small place, it scrutinized closely the comings and goings of its faculty. It did so, among other ways, in an annual publication with the nondescript title, The Mid-Winter Bulletin. Each bulletin listed, albeit sporadically, faculty activities for the previous year. Here one could read about who attended what professional meeting, who lectured at which university, who spoke to which civic group, and who preached at the then mandatory campus chapel services. One also could read about faculty awards and honors, and about faculty appointments to committees, on and off campus.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 186 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Books

Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. New York: Prentice Hall, 1935.Google Scholar
Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1942.Google Scholar
The Struggle for Party Government. College Park, MD, Program in American Civilization, The University of Maryland, 1948.Google Scholar
A Guide to the Study of Public Affairs (with Jones, Victor and Bailey, S. K.). New York: William Sloane Associates, 1952.Google Scholar
Equilibrium and Change in American Politics. Bureau of Government Research, The University of Maryland, 1958.Google Scholar
The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1960.Google Scholar
Two Hundred Million Americans in Search of a Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1969.Google Scholar
“Partisan Politics and Administrative Agencies,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 221, May, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Party Government for Employment Policy,” American Political Science Review, 39, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Congress: An Explanation,” Social Action, 12, September, 1946.Google Scholar
“Pressure Groups and Parties,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 259, September, 1948.Google Scholar
“Our Unrecognized Governmental Crisis,” Social Action, 16, October, 1950.Google Scholar
“The Democratic Party,” American Annals, 1950.Google Scholar
“The Republican Party,” American Annals, 1950.Google Scholar
“Congress in Conflict,” The Yale Review, 41, 1951.Google Scholar
“The Democratic Party,” American Annual, 1952.Google Scholar
“The Republican Party,” American Annual, 1952.Google Scholar
“Political Parties and the Public Interest,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 280, March, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Politicians and Bankers,” Christianity and Society, 17, no. ii, Spring, 1953.Google Scholar
“Break Down the Departmental Walls,” The Saturday Review, November 21, 1953.Google Scholar
“1954: The Ike Party Fights to Live,” New Republic, 128, February 23, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Intensity, Visibility, Direction and Scope,” American Political Science Review, 51, 1957. (Presidential Address)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Review of McKean, D. D., The Boss: The Hague Machine in Action , in American Political Science Review, 35, 1941.Google Scholar
Review of Garceau, Oliver, The Political Life of the American Medical Association , in American Political Science Review, 35, 1941.Google Scholar
Review of Herring, Pendleton, The Politics of Democracy , in American Political Science Review, 38, 1944.Google Scholar
Review of Fitzpatrick, Edward A., McCarthy of Wisconsin , in Political Science Quarterly, 59, 1944.Google Scholar
Review of Ettlinger, Harold, The Axis on the Air , in American Political Science Review, 38, 1944.Google Scholar
Review of Cross, Wilbur L., A Connecticut Yankee , in Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 30, 1944.Google Scholar
Review of Pepper, George Wharton, Philadelphia Lawyer: An Autobiography , in American Political Science Review, 39, 1945.Google Scholar
Review of Chace, Stuart, Democracy Under Pressure: Special Interests Versus Public Welfare , in Political Science Quarterly, 60, 1945.Google Scholar
Review of Reed, Thomas H. and Reed, Doris D., Preparing College Men and Women for Politics , in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 284, November, 1952.Google Scholar
“United States: The Functional Approach to Party Government,” in Neumann, Sigmund, ed., Modern Political Parties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Committee on the Political Parties of the American Political Science Association, Toward a More Responsible Two Party System. New York: Rinehart, 1950. Schattschneider chaired this committee. This Report was also published as a Supplement to the American Political Science Review, 44, 1950.Google Scholar