Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:50:14.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Data Accessibility in Political Science: Putting the Principle Into Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Katherine Tate
Affiliation:
Ohio State University

Extract

Like Gary King and Paul Herrnson, we believe that making our data accessible can strengthen and advance scholarly knowledge. King and Herrnson, however, disagree about the measures necessary to ensure that data are widely available to achieve this collective good. Herrnson criticizes King's recommendations as potentially bad for the profession. As scholars who have collected data and relied on others' data for our own research, and—equally important—as relatively new Ph.D.s in political science, we have our own perspective in this debate over replication and data accessibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Herrnson, Paul. 1995. “Replication, Verification, Secondary Analysis, and Data Collection in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3):452455.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3):444452.Google Scholar
Groner, Jonathan. 1993. “Dispute Over Sacred Scrolls Lands in U.S. Court: Who Owns Text About the Torah?” Legal Times (September 20):2.Google Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1995. “Coding Style and Good Computing Practices.” The Political Methodologist 6(2):28.Google Scholar
Sheatsley, Paul B. and Mitofsky, Warren J. 1992. A Meeting Place. New York: American Association for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar