Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:11:40.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing Canada? The 1995 Quebec Sovereignty Referendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Harold D. Clarke  and
Allan Kornberg
Harold D. Clarke
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Allan Kornberg
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his recent book on the many puzzles of Canadian nationalism, Richard Gwyn (1995, 9) notes that more Canadians (97%) cite their own country as the best in the world than do citizens of any other country. Notwithstanding this coup and the fact that Canada is one of the world's oldest continuously functioning democracies, in an October 30, 1995 referendum, the citizens of Quebec were again asked (as they had been in May, 1980) to vote oui or non on a proposal that would secure the political independence of Quebec. Although Quebeckers rejected the 1980 sovereignty proposal by a three to two margin, the 1995 sovereignty proposal failed by the proverbial eyelash. Why a country described by British writer Jan Morris as “all in all, on the whole, the most admirable on earth” (cited in Gwyn 1995, 51) should periodically appear on the brink of falling apart is a question that has engaged us because of our longstanding interest in the conditions under which democratic political systems are sustained over time.

It can be argued that many of the conditions associated with the emergence and development of a democracy were already obtained in 1867 when the new Dominion of Canada was created by an act of the British parliament. Inter alia, these included a Westminster-model parliamentary government, the rule of law, nascent political parties and free, competitive elections. However, as we have argued elsewhere (Kornberg and Clarke 1992, 12–19), the downside of “Confederation” (as the establishment of the Canadian state is termed) was that it either laid the groundwork for, or exacerbated, many of the national integration problems Canada has experienced.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 676 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brulé, Michel. 1992. “France After Maastricht.” The Public Perspective November/December:28–30.Google Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1992. Charter versus Federalism: The Dilemmas of Constitutional Reform. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Kornberg, Allan. 1994. “The Politics and Economics of Constitutional Choice: Voting in Canada's 1992 National Referendum.” Journal of Politics 56:940–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, Jane, LeDuc, Lawrence, and Pammett, Jon H. 1996. Absent Mandate: Canadian Electoral Politics in an Era of Restructuring. Toronto: Gage.Google Scholar
Cook, Ramsay. 1995. Canada, Quebec and the Uses of Nationalism. 2nd ed. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Élections 94: Rapport des résultats officiels du scrutin. 1994. Québec: Le Directueur général des élections du Québec.Google Scholar
Feigert, Frank. 1989. Canada Votes: 1935–1988. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Marsh, Michael, and McLaren, Lauren. 1994. “Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht.” Journal of Common Market Studies 32:455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwyn, Richard. 1995. Nationalism Without Walls: The Unbearable Lightness of Being Canadian. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan, and Clarke, Harold D., eds. 1983. Political Support in Canada: The Crisis Years. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan, and Clarke, Harold D. 1992. Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 1993. “Canada's Constitutional Referendum of 1992: A Great Big No.” Electoral Studies 12:257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McRoberts, Kenneth. 1988. Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis. 3rd ed. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Monahan, Patrick J. 1991. Meech Lake: The Inside Story. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Pammett, Jon H. et al. 1983. “Political Support and Voting Behavior in the Quebec Referendum.” In Political Support in Canada: The Crisis Years, ed. Kornberg, Allan and Clarke, Harold D.. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter H. 1992. Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Be a Sovereign People? Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter H. 1993. “The End of Mega Constitutional Politics in Canada?” PS: Political Science & Politics. March:33–37.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Mildred A. 1974. Politics and Territory: The Sociology of Regional Persistence in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirty-Fifth General Election 1993 Official Voting Results: Synopsis. 1993. Ottawa: Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.Google Scholar
Wilson-Smith, Anthony. 1995. “A House Divided.” Macleans. November 13:14–16.Google Scholar