Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:02:09.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Changing World of Think Tanks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

R. Kent Weaver*
Affiliation:
The Brookings Institution

Extract

Economists and political observers in recent years have bemoaned the decline of American competitiveness in traditional industries such as steel, automobiles, and textiles. Some of these observers worry that the U.S. economy will increasingly be dominated by service industries. At least one service industry in the United States does appear to be growing and thriving, despite some very adverse economic circumstances. That industry is the non-profit public policy research industry, more commonly known as “think tanks.” The think tank universe has become much more diverse over the past decade, reflecting both new entrants into the marketplace of ideas and changes in these organizations' environment. There are, moreover, inherent tensions in any of the three main models (“university without students,” contract researcher, and advocacy tank) that think tanks may pursue. Attempting to mix the models can be difficult too.

These tensions and environmental changes have created tremendous uncertainty, but also some entrepreneurial opportunities, for think tank managers. Increasingly, these managers must be concerned with finding a viable niche in a crowded, fragmented market. And they must do so while dealing with staffs who may be resistant not only to specific courses of change, but also to external direction of any sort.

Type
The Changing World of Think Tanks
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Enterprise Institute. 1987. 1987 Annual Report. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Bencivenga, Jim. 1984. “Young, Brash and Conservative.” Christian Science Monitor, October 5.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney. 1986. “Hard Times at the Think Tank.” Washington Post, June 26.Google Scholar
Brookings Institution. 1987. Annual Report 1987. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Center for Strategic and International Studies. 1988. 1987-88 Programs and Activities. Washington, DC. Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Fly, Richard. 1986. “What's In for Presidential Hopefuls: Think Tanks.” Business Week, May 12.Google Scholar
Heritage Foundation. 1987. 1987 Annual Report. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kelley, Peter. 1988. “Think Tanks Fall Between Pure Research and Lobbying.” Houston Chronicle, March 9.Google Scholar
Kidder, Rushworth M. 1984. “From Left to Center.” Christian Science Monitor, October 2.Google Scholar
Landers, Robert K. 1986. “Think Tanks: The New Partisans?Editorial Research Reports, 1, 23, June 20.Google Scholar
Moore, John W. 1988. “Local Right Thinkers.” National Journal, October 1.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, James. 1985. “Heritage Hype.” The New Republic, September 2.Google Scholar
Safire, William. 1986. “Tanks for the Memories.” New York Times, September 1.Google Scholar
Victor, Kirk. 1988. “After the Victory.” National Journal, September 24.Google Scholar
Whittle, Richard. 1985. “Journalists Fill Up at Think Tanks.” Dallas Morning News, November 10.Google Scholar