Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:05:37.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Center: A Look at the Centennial Center for Political Science & Public Affairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Jeff Biggs
Affiliation:
Director, Centennial Center for Political Science & Public Affairs and the Congressional Fellows Program
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

You could call it serendipity or a mutually felicitous target of opportunity, but the APSA Congressional Fellowship Program and the Centennial Center for Political Science & Public Affairs—now under my and Veronica Jones' direction—found productive common ground in November 2011 that will continue into the programs' future. In addition to physical proximity—the two programs share the same floor at APSA—the similar content areas and background shared by Centennial Scholars and Congressional Fellows Program has overlapped since the center's founding seven years ago. Centennial Center scholars have been routinely invited to participate in any segment of the fellowship's six-week orientation program that was of interest to them. And, over the years, several of the scholars later became congressional fellows.

Type
Association News
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Food for Thought and Discussion

You could call it serendipity or a mutually felicitous target of opportunity, but the APSA Congressional Fellowship Program and the Centennial Center for Political Science & Public Affairs—now under my and Veronica Jones' direction—found productive common ground in November 2011 that will continue into the programs' future. In addition to physical proximity—the two programs share the same floor at APSA—the similar content areas and background shared by Centennial Scholars and Congressional Fellows Program has overlapped since the center's founding seven years ago. Centennial Center scholars have been routinely invited to participate in any segment of the fellowship's six-week orientation program that was of interest to them. And, over the years, several of the scholars later became congressional fellows.

Building opportunity

In November 2011 that latent synergy was taken one step further by incorporating four brown-bag lunches with Centennial Center scholars into the Congressional Fellowship Program's orientation. The inherent diversity of the Congressional Fellowship Program—which ranges from political science scholars in the early stages of their career, journalists, Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy fellows, Atlantic Philanthropies Health and Aging Policy fellows, Foreign Service officers and analysts from the US Government intelligence community, international fellows sponsored by the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Asia Foundation, and American-Australian Fellowship, and Native American Hatfield Fellowship—results in a built-in core audience for most research topics undertaken by Centennial Center scholars. This audience was further expanded with invitations extended to local academic professoriate and graduate students, as well as other institutional representatives. In additional to APSA staff, guests included Colleen Shogan, a former political science congressional fellow who is now assistant director for government and finance at the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, Stephen Cohen of the Brookings Institution, senior research assistant Constantino Xavier of the Brookings Institution's 21st Century Defense Initiative, Jackson Douglas of Jefferson Waterman International, Benjamin Frankel of Security Studies Journal, Scholar-in-Residence Marvin Weinbaum of the Middle East Institute, and the Institute of Medicine's Director of Health Policy Educational Programs and Fellowships and former Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy Fellow Marie Michnich.

Involving others

This November, the average audience ranged in the 20s for each of the four brown-bag lunches despite having committed the unforgiveable—at least in the Washington, DC area where events are always accompanied by free food—asking guests to bring their own lunch. In the future, while we hope that our larder is sufficient to provide sandwiches to all, we believe that the Centennial Center brown-bag lunches can create a small-scale intellectual focal point. As we witnessed this fall, these lunch discussions provided a mutually beneficial opportunity: Centennial scholars presented their on-going research to an attentive and well-informed audience who, in turn, provided new insights to focus their research; the scholars offered new and creative dimensions to enlarge the congressional fellows' and the audience's understanding of key issues.

Discussions

The first brown-bag lunch featured associate professor Dinshaw Mistry of the University of Cincinnati on “Diplomacy, Domestic Politics, and the Civilian Nuclear Agreement with India.” Most of the congressional fellows in his audience had participated in the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies September–October foreign affairs seminar (Harun Dogo, Pardee Rand Graduate School, American Australian Association Fellow Andrew Brookes, Asia Foundation and Thai diplomatic corps fellow Natee Vichitsorasatra, State Department Foreign Service officer Matthew Asada, Central Intelligence Agency analysts Adrienne Izzo, Dan Marambio and Gregory Becker, and senior space integration engineer from the Office of the Secretary of Defense Timothy M. Boudreaux). Professor Mistry focused on the unprecedented 2005–2008 process of bending the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) on behalf of India to achieve a new relationship with that country. Up to that point, the original nuclear powers of the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, and China were all signatories of the NPT, as were Brazil, Argentina, South Africa, Japan, and Germany in the 1970s and 1980s. Then, the only nonsignatory nuclear nations were India, Pakistan, and Israel that were denied trading rights until they signed the treaty. In 2000, Condoleezza Rice had stated that the United States “should pay closer attention to India's role in the regional balance…India is an element in China's calculation, and it should be in America's, too,” but if the assumption was that the agreement with India was going to be easy sledding, the assumption was off the mark. Between 2005 and 2006 there were nine open congressional hearings and two additional closed hearings. Editorial and op-ed pieces in newspapers such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Washington Times and The Wall Street Journal were largely supportive (Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of Defense William Cohen, and Senators Kerry and Domenici were examples), but with a significant degree of opposition from influential authors such as Thomas Friedman, Strobe Talbott, and former senator Sam Nunn. Although the agreement ultimately received congressional authorization, misgivings among NPT supporters remain in the United States. Furthermore, some question the degree to which the agreement cemented a new relationship with India over the long term.

The second lunch featured associate professor Takakazu Yamagishi of Nanzan University in Japan who contrasted the Japanese and US healthcare systems. His congressional fellowship attendees were drawn from the Atlantic Philanthropies Health & Aging and the Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy fellowships that included the University of Maryland School of Medicine's Dawn Alley, postdoctoral research fellow with Scott & White Healthcare Karon Phillips, program director with San Francisco's Family Service Agency Erica Solway, University of North Carolina Department of Health Policy and Management's Sally Stearns, Dartmouth Medical School's Julie Bynum, New York Presbyterian/Allen Hospital's Executive Director Mike Fosina, University of Texas School of Nursing's Tracie Harrison, Harvard Medical School's Lew Lipsitz, Arizona State University College of Nursing's Adriana Perez, University of Alabama department of medicine vice-chair for clinical affairs Nancy Dunlap, City College of San Francisco nursing instructor Liana Orsolini-Hain, Manatt-Phelps-Phillips attorney Arun Patel, Virginia State Health Policy Institute's professor of dentistry Carole Pratt, and University of New Mexico graduate medical education associate dean David Sklar. Although Professor Yamagishi's current research focus is on US veteran's healthcare, much of the discussion centered on his recent Johns Hopkins University Press book War and Health Insurance Policy in Japan and the United States: World War II to Postwar Reconstruction. A spirited discussion featured characteristics of the Japanese healthcare system including its universal coverage, integrated fee system, relatively low cost of treatment, free access to doctors, near absence of malpractice suits, but seriously overworked doctors who are also in short supply relative to the need. Although the Japanese healthcare system was terra incognita for most of the audience, it was fascinating the degree to which they engaged in the comparative systems conversation. They raised a host of issues including the requirement that US physicians, unlike the Japanese counterparts, are required to complete continuing education to attain required periodic recertification in their fields.

The same audience attended the third lunch on “The Role of Health Policy Experts in the Evolution of American Health Policy” by Centennial Center scholar Ulrike Lepont. Ms. Lepont is an honors MA graduate from both Sciences-Po and the Sorbonne in Paris and a doctoral candidate at the University of Montpellier in France. She had already interviewed close to 50 US academic and think-tank scholars who were engaged in health policy. This proved to enlarge her circle of contacts with APSA Congressional Fellows from a variety of health fields who were in the process of congressional interviews to secure their own legislative assignments that would provide new insights in the health policy field. The discussion focused on the evolution of prominent expert's ideas, the relationships with policy makers, and the professional and intellectual networks in which they worked. Ms. Lepont's research spans the 1970s through 2010 and concentrates on three types of medical experts: regulators (the prevailing Democratic Party approach which has reluctantly integrated their program preferences for the public option in the market-based framework), the micro-economists (more attuned to the Republican Party market-based approach), and the clinical or epidemiologists category which is only recently finding resonance in the policy realm. Ms. Lepont's conclusions suggest that experts have to adapt their own ideas to the prevailing political norms and that congressional policy makers tend to select experts that correspond to the policy maker's interests and values. Not surprisingly, even these tentative conclusions prompted a great deal of audience discussion and provided Ms. Lepont with a variety of new avenues of inquiry.

The final brown-bag lunch featured Anne Pluta on “The Changing Dimensions of Popular Presidential Communication: Washington to Obama.” This was tailor made for the political scientist congressional fellows including PhD candidate James Curry of the University of Maryland, assistant professor Janna Dietz of Western Illinois University, Rutgers PhD candidate Kelly Dittmar, Stanford PhD candidate Christopher Tausanovitch, Pardee Rand Graduate School PhD candidate Harun Dogo, Old Dominion University assistant professor Jesse Richman, American University assistant professor Jordan Tama, PhD candidate Caitlin O'Grady of the University of Oklahoma's Carl Albert Center, German Marshall Fund fellows Paul Maeser and Diana Gierstorfer, Hatfield fellow Darrell Lawrence, and several politically engaged health policy fellows. Invited guests provided particularly helpful research and framing suggestions invited guests, such as former congressional fellow Colleen Shogan whose book The Moral Rhetoric of American Presidents chartered a similar theme, were particularly helpful in suggesting research and framing ideas to Ms. Pluta.

Ms. Pluta is a PhD candidate at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Her dissertation focuses on popular presidential communication (speeches, letters, annual messages, inaugural addresses, veto messages, and messages to Congress) and the influence of institutions on this communication. Her research is enhanced by her graduate training as a historian. She is especially interested in nineteenth century presidents.

Conclusion

As staff and participants assess the four November brown-bag lunch presentations, we recognize the vital synergy benefits for both the Congressional Fellows Program and the Centennial Center scholars as well as the potential to attract an expanded audience from the nearby academic institutions and think tanks.

Now that the Congressional Fellowship Program orientation program is completed, we are considering extending this brown-bag lunch concept by including future Centennial Center scholars in the Congressional Fellowship Program's biweekly Wilson Seminar Series. Here, the audience could be expanded to include selected congressional staff and Congressional Research Service analysts.

To find out more about these programs visit www.apsanet.org/content_3436; join us for lunch.

About the Centennial Center

The Centennial Center for Political Science and Public Affairs is an invaluable resource to political and social scientists. Since its opening in September 2003, the center has housed more than 100 scholars. Full details on the center and the Visiting Scholars Program are online at http://www.apsanet.org/centennialcenter. You may also contact Veronica Jones at APSA: (202) 483-2512; .