Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T08:18:06.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing Assessment: Examining the Assessment Plans at 50 Political Science Departments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2008

John Ishiyama
Affiliation:
Truman State University
Marijke Breuning
Affiliation:
Truman State University

Extract

This paper represents a broad survey study of assessment models used in political science programs at 50 universities and colleges across the country. We examine the most frequently used assessment activities and then investigate whether differences between institutions is a function of institutional characteristics. What are the techniques currently employed by departments across the country?

Type
THE PROFESSION
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelo, Thomas A. 1995. “Reassessing (and Defining) Assessment.” AAHE Bulletin 48 (2): 79.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Michelle. 2005. “Assessment Through the Grassroots: Assessing the Department via Student Peer Evaluation.” Journal of Political Science Education 1: 10927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, Michelle, and Paul Folger. 2005. “Assessment that Matters: Integrating the ‘Chore’ of Department-Based Assessment with Real Improvements in Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 1: 27787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golich, Vicki. 1998. “Thinking about Assessment.” www.apsanet.org/imgtest/GolichThinkAssessment.pdf (November 10, 2006).Google Scholar
Hill, Jeffrey. 2005. “Developing a Culture of Assessment: Insights from Theory and ExperienceJournal of Political Science Education 1: 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Barbara. 2005. “Assessment Methods—A Close-Up Look.” www.apsanet.org/imgtest/Methodscloseup2.doc (December 2, 2006).Google Scholar