Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:54:13.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Playing the Woman Card is Playing Trump: Assessing the Efficacy of Framing Campaigns as Historic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Leslie Caughell
Leslie Caughell*
Affiliation:
Virginia Wesleyan College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Candidate gender has become a major theme in the 2016 presidential campaign. Secretary Clinton appears to be emphasizing her gender to a greater degree than she did in 2008, even invoking gender in primary debates as something that separates her from the political establishment. Her opponent in the general election, Donald Trump, claimed that Clinton was playing the “woman card” and that Clinton has little to offer as a candidate beyond her sex. However, scholars have little sense of the effectiveness of playing the woman card by emphasizing the historic first associated with a candidacy, a strategy with inherent risks. This project examines the effect of playing the woman card by emphasizing the historic nature of a female executive candidate, and demonstrates that playing the woman card may actually benefit female candidates among certain subsets of voters. Playing the gender card appeals to voters traditionally underrepresented in politics and to weak Democrats and independents. These findings suggest that playing the gender card may benefit female candidates, especially Democrats, in elections.

Type
Articles
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 736 - 742
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aday, Sean and Devitt, James. 2001. “Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6 (2): 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, Maria. 1996. Women Politicians and the Media. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Carol. 2015. “Playing the Gender Card: The Uses and Abuses of Gender in Australian Politics.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 291–319.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 96–107.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Lawrence, Regina G., Rose, Melody, and Weber, Christopher R.. 2013. “Traits versus Issues: How Female Candidates Shape Coverage of Senate and Gubernatorial Races.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3): 715–26.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika. 2008. Women for President: Media Bias in Nine Campaigns. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika. 2013. “Clinton and the Playing-the-Gender-Card Metaphor in Campaign News.” Feminist Media Studies 13 (2): 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldman, Caroline, Carroll, Susan J., and Olson, Stephanie. 2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Bid for the Republication Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22 (3): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G. and Rose, Melody. 2009. Hilary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail . Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeks, Lindsey. 2012. “Is She ‘Man Enough’? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage.” Journal of Communication 62 (1): 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Brenda L. and Oswald, Debra. 2015. “When Sexism Cuts Both Ways: Predictors of Tolerance of Sexual Harassment of Men.” Men and Masculinities (TBD): 1–21. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X15602745 Google Scholar
Seltzer, Richard, Newman, Jody and Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swim, Janet K., Aikin, Kathryn J., Hall, Wayne S., and Hunter, Barbara A.. 1995. “Sexism and Racism: Old Fashioned and Modem Prejudices.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lauren M. and Nauta, Margaret M.. 2013. “Sexism as a Predictor of Attitudes Toward Women in the Military and in Combat” Military Psychology 25 (2): 166–71.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Caughell supplementary material

Appendix

Download Caughell supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 65.8 KB

A correction has been issued for this article:

Errata