Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:20:33.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State-Level Forecasts for the 2020 US Presidential Election: Tough Victory Ahead for Biden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2020

Bruno Jérôme ,
Véronique Jérôme ,
Philippe Mongrain Open the ORCID record for Philippe Mongrain [Opens in a new window]  and
Richard Nadeau Open the ORCID record for Richard Nadeau [Opens in a new window]
Bruno Jérôme
Affiliation:
Université Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas
Véronique Jérôme
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Sud Saclay
Philippe Mongrain
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Richard Nadeau
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Forecasting the 2020 US Elections
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 77 - 80
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berry, Michael J., and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 2012. “Forecasting the 2012 Presidential Election with State-Level Economic Indicators.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 669–74.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1992. “Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (2): 386–407.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E., Ali, Syed, and Jalalzai, Farida. 2006. “Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the States, 1948–2004.” Journal of Political Marketing 5 (1-2): 33–57.Google Scholar
Jérôme, Bruno. 2020. “State-Level Forecasts for the 2020 US Presidential Election: Tough Victory Ahead for Biden.” Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.7910/DVN/QUPBSR.Google Scholar
Jérôme, Bruno, and Jérôme-Speziari, Véronique. 2012a. “Forecasting the 2012 French Presidential Election: Comparing Vote Function Simulations and Vote Intention Polls.” French Politics 10 (1): 22–43.Google Scholar
Jérôme, Bruno, and Jérôme-Speziari, Véronique. 2012b. “Forecasting the 2012 US Presidential Election: Lessons from a State-by-State Political Economy Model.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 663–68.Google Scholar
Jérôme, Bruno, and Jérôme-Speziari, Véronique. 2016. “State-Level Forecasts for the 2016 US Presidential Elections: Political Economy Model Predicts Hillary Clinton Victory.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): 680–86.Google Scholar
Kayser, Mark Andreas, and Leininger, Arndt. 2017. “A Länder-Based Forecast of the 2017 German Bundestag Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 689–92.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl E. 2012. “State-Level Forecasts of the 2012 Federal and Gubernatorial Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 655–62.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (3): 416–24.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Jérôme et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QUPBSR
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Jérôme et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Jérôme et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.5 MB