Article contents
Research, Identities, and Praxis: The Tensions ofIntegrating Identity into the Field Experience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2009
Extract
Scientists seek to participate in the collective process ofcumulative knowledge building. As scientists, we are bound to theprinciple of objective neutrality in the assessment of our data andin the formulation of our inferences and conclusions. However, theproduction of knowledge does not need to be, and some would saycannot be, a valueless process, devoid of opinion. The imperativesfor the investigator are intellectual honesty, transparency inresearch, and objectivity in the assessment of data. If valuejudgments are accepted as permissible it is then worthwhile todiscuss the relationships between the investigator's identity, thosevalue judgments, and the design and conduct of research. Indeed,investigators possess multiple identities; these multiple identitiesmay, at various times and places, aid or impede the researchprocess. Moreover, these intersectional identities, and theinconsistency with which these identities are granted status invarious environments, leave the researcher well positioned toexplore social stratification, hierarchies of power, andinequality.
- Type
- Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009
References
- 2
- Cited by