Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-67gbf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T03:26:06.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproducible and Replicable: An Empirical Assessment of the Social Construction of Politically Relevant Target Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2018

Rebecca J. Kreitzer  and
Candis Watts Smith
Rebecca J. Kreitzer
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Candis Watts Smith
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schneider and Ingram introduced the pivotal theory of social construction of target populations in the American Political Science Review nearly 25 years ago. There, they developed four ideal type groups: advantaged, contenders, dependents, and deviants. They noted that there may be contention around the construction of the groups but implied an expectation of consensus. There has not been, however, a systematic categorization of politically salient target groups based on these categories, nor has there been an empirical assessment of whether or the extent to which consensus around the social constructions of salient target groups exists. We revisit this theory to offer a novel perspective and do so by leveraging advances in technology and methodological strategies. By crowdsourcing the task of evaluating the social construction of various target populations, we are able to assess underlying assumptions of theory as well as outline avenues for future research on policy design.

Type
Articles
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 768 - 774
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The author order is alphabetical. Both authors contributed equally to this article.

References

REFERENCES

Benoit, Kenneth, Conway, Drew, Lauderdale, Benjamin E., Laver, Michael, and Mikhaylov, Slava. 2016. “Crowd-Sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data.” American Political Science Review 110 (2): 278–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, Aidan, and Pacuit, Eric. 2013. “The Wisdom of Crowds: Methods of Human Judgement Aggregation.” In Handbook of Human Computation, ed. Michelucci, Pietro, 599–614. New York: Springer Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Steven V. 2015. “A Reliability Analysis of Mechanical Turk Data.” Computers in Human Behavior 43: 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. (Ed.). 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 2005. “Public Policy and the Social Construction of Deservedness.” In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Target Populations, ed. Schneider, Anne and Ingram, Helen, 1–28. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne L., Ingram, Helen, and DeLeon, Peter. 2014. “Democratic Policy Design: Social Construction of Target Populations.” In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Sabatier, Paul A. and Weible, Christopher, 105–49. Boulder, CO: Westerview Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Sidney, Mara. 2009. “What Is Next for Policy Design and Social-Construction Theory?” Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroedel, Jean Reith, and Jordan, Daniel R.. 1998. “Senate Voting and Social Construction of Target Populations: A Study of AIDS Policy Making, 1987–1992.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 23 (1): 107–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kreitzer and Smith supplementary material

Kreitzer and Smith supplementary material 1

Download Kreitzer and Smith supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 125 KB