Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:05:44.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological Underpinnings of Post-Truth in Political Beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2019

Rose McDermott*
Affiliation:
Brown University

Abstract

Although both the idea and the reality of so-called fake news or disinformation campaigns long precede the Trump administration, the frequency and intensity of the discussion around its prevalence and influence have increased significantly since Donald Trump took office. In an era when technological innovations support increasingly inexpensive and easy ways to produce media that looks official, the ability to separate real from artificial has become increasingly complicated and difficult. Some of the responsibility for public manipulation certainly rests with those who present false or artificial information as real. However, their relative success depends on, at least in part, universal psychological processes that often make humans susceptible to believing things that are not true. For example, people often weigh emotional feelings more heavily than abstract facts in their decision making. This discussion examines the psychological foundations that render individuals susceptible to a post-truth media environment and allow it to emerge, escalate, and persist.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ariely, Dan, and Jones, Simon. 2012. The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone—Especially Ourselves, Vol. 336. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1991. “The Narrative Construction of Reality.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cillizza, Chris. 2016. “How the Heck Can Voters Think Donald Trump Is More Honest Than Hillary Clinton?” Washington Post, November 2.Google Scholar
Clement, Scott, and Guskin, Emily. 2016. “Post-ABC Tracking Poll Finds Race Tied, as Trump Opens up an 8-Point Edge on Honesty.” Washington Post, November 2.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7 (2): 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frum, David. 2016. “The Seven Broken Guard Rails of Democracy.” The Atlantic, May 31.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Dan. 1991. “How Mental Systems Believe.” American Psychologist 46 (2): 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasher, Lynn, Goldstein, David, and Toppino, Thomas. 1977. “Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16 (1): 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 2012. “Inference with Mental Models.” The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 134–45.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Egan, Patrick. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow, Vol. 1. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Keyes, Ralph. 2004. The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hakkyun, Park, Kiwan, and Schwarz, Norbert. 2009. “Will This Trip Really Be Exciting? The Role of Incidental Emotions in Product Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 36 (6): 983–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William, and Posner, Richard. 1976. “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 249307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Seifert, Colleen M., Schwarz, Norbert, and Cook, John. 2012. “Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13: 106–31. Available at DOI 10.1177/1529100612451018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Charles, Ross, Lee, and Lepper, Mark. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (11): 2098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2013. “Communicating Science in Politicized Environments.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3): 14048–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, Claire. 2016. “Americans Don’t Trust Their Institutions Anymore.” FiveThirtyEight, November 16. Available at https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-dont-trust-their-institutions-anymore.Google Scholar
Nagler, Rebekah H. 2014. “Adverse Outcomes Associated with Media Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Messages.” Journal of Health Communication 19 (1): 2440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford Dictionary. 2016. Word of the Year, November 16. Oxford, UK. Available at en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2017. “Global Warming and Environmental Regulation, Global Environmentalism.” October 5. Available at www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/7-global-warming-and-environmental-regulation-personal-environmentalism.Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz, and Plasser, Gunda. 2002. Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1957. “Philosophy of Science.” British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, ed. Mace, C. A.. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael D., and Clore, Gerald. 2002. “Belief and Feeling: Evidence for an Accessibility Model of Emotional Self-Report.” Psychological Bulletin 128 (6): 934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Norbert, Newman, Eryn, and Leach, William D.. 2016. “Making the Truth Stick and the Myths Fade: Lessons from Cognitive Psychology.” Behavioral Science & Policy 2 (1): 8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Norbert, and Clore, Gerald L.. 1996. “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences.” In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd edition, eds. Kruglanski, A. and Higgins, E. T., 385407. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Seifert, Colleen. 2002. “The Continued Influence of Misinformation in Memory.” Psychology of Learning and Motivation 41: 265–92. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesich, Steve. 1992. “A Government of Lies.” The Nation, January 6.Google Scholar
Weaver, Kimberlee, Garcia, Stephen M., Schwarz, Norbert, and Miller, Dale T.. 2007. “Inferring the Popularity of an Opinion from its Familiarity: A Repetitive Voice Can Sound Like a Chorus.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (5): 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar