Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T06:18:55.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Feedback, Energy Equity, and Climate Justice: Can Existing Policies Improve Solar Access for Low- and Moderate-Income Communities in the United States?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

Aparajita Datta Open the ORCID record for Aparajita Datta [Opens in a new window]
Aparajita Datta*
Affiliation:
University of Houston, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of rooftop solar in the United States, its deployment and associated benefits have not been distributed equitably. Many states have adopted targeted incentives to improve access to rooftop solar and increase its uptake among low- and moderate-income (LMI) communities. This article examines the policy feedback effects of energy efficiency policies and electricity-sector portfolio standards on the adoption and diffusion of LMI solar incentives across states. Event History Analyses indicate that between 2010 and 2019, the adoption and diffusion of the incentives have been conditional on a state’s portfolio standards but independent of energy efficiency policies. Feedback effects from the portfolio standards in neighboring states are found to have a regressive impact on the likelihood of adoption. Hence, the feedback effects of previously adopted renewable energy policies are helping states to better serve vulnerable communities. However, there is no evidence of geographic clustering in the diffusion of incentives.

Type
Special Issue on Climate Change and Vulnerable Populations
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , October 2024 , pp. 463 - 472
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adeh, Elnaz H., Good, Stephen P., Calaf, Marc, and Higgins, Chad W.. 2019. “Solar PV Power Potential Is Greatest Over Croplands.” Scientific Reports 9:11442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47803-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmad, Manzoor, and Zheng, Jianghuai. 2021. “Does Innovation in Environmental-Related Technologies Cyclically and Asymmetrically Affect Environmental Sustainability in BRICS Nations?” Technology in Society 67:101746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel, Campbell, Andrea Louise, and Weaver, R. Kent. 2022. Policy Feedback: How Policies Shape Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/core/elements/policy-feedback/3231877106C458D0CF766173080B0409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Eric, and Lacombe, Donald J.. 2017. “Spatial Dependence in State Renewable Policy: Effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards on Renewable Generation Within NERC Regions.” The Energy Journal 38 (3): 177–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 2021. Arlington, VA: Policy Hub.Google Scholar
Datta, Aparajita. 2024. “Replication Data for ‘Policy Feedback, Energy Equity, and Climate Justice: Can Existing Policies Improve Solar Access for Low- and Moderate-Income Communities in the United States?’” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.7910/DVN/ML09LM.Google Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano, and Kim, Woojin. 2022. Policy Diffusion and Polarization Across US States. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electricity Consumer Resource Council. 2009. Revenue Decoupling and Its Alternatives. https://elcon.org/wp-content/uploads/Revenue20Decoupling20and20Its20Alternatives1.pdf.Google Scholar
Feldman, David, Ramasamy, Vignesh, Fu, Ran, Ramdas, Ashwin, Desai, Jal, and Margolis, Robert. 2021. US Solar Photovoltaic System and Energy Storage Cost Benchmark (Q1 2020). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleo, Annie, Kushler, Marty, Molina, Maggie, and York, Dan. 2015. Valuing Efficiency: A Review of Lost Revenue Adjustment Mechanism. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/u1503.pdf.Google Scholar
Graham, Erin R., Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2013. “The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 673–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, Michael, and Nath, Ishan. 2019. “Do Renewable Portfolio Standards Deliver?” Social Science Research Network. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3374942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heeter, Jenny, Sekar, Ashok, Fekete, Emily, Shah, Monisha, and Cook, Jeffrey J.. 2021. Affordable and Accessible Solar for All: Barriers, Solutions, and On-Site Adoption Potential. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Google Scholar
Inflation Reduction Act. 2022. “H.R. 5376.” Washington, DC: 117th US Congress.Google Scholar
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. 2021. “H.R. 3684.” Washington, DC: 117th US Congress.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Mettler, Suzanne, and Zhu, Ling. 2022. “The Pathways of Policy Feedback: How Health Reform Influences Political Efficacy and Participation.” Policy Studies Journal 50 (3): 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamoorti, Ramanan. 2020. “Transitioning to a Sustainable Energy Paradigm.” Annual Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Ashley. 2020. Electricity Portfolio Standards: Background, Design Elements, and Policy Considerations. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45913/6.Google Scholar
Lee, Hoesung, Calvin, Katherine, Dasgupta, Dipak, Krinner, Gerhard, Mukherji, Aditi, Thorne, Peter, Trisos, Christopher, Romero, José, Aldunce, Paulina, and Barret, Ko. 2023. “Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC,” ed. Hoesung Lee and José Romero. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Levin, Kelly, Cashore, Benjamin, Bernstein, Steven, and Auld, Graeme. 2012. “Overcoming the Tragedy of Super-Wicked Problems: Constraining Our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change.” Policy Sciences 45 (2): 123–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, Vijay, and Peterson, Robert A.. 1978. “Innovation Diffusion in a Dynamic Potential Adopter Population.” Management Science 24 (15): 1589–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Ravi. 2022. “Increasing Access to Solar for Low-Income Households in Multifamily Affordable Housing.” Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society. Albuquerque, NM: ASES National Conference.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and SoRelle, Mallory. 2018. “Policy Feedback Theory.” In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Weible, Christopher M., 103–34. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Brendan, and Jordan, Andrew. 2020. “Disaggregating the Dependent Variable in Policy Feedback Research: An Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading System.” Policy Sciences 53:291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2009. Decoupling Policies: Options to Encourage Energy-Efficiency Policies for Utilities; Clean Energy Policies in States and Communities. www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/46606.pdf.Google Scholar
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2021. Low- and Moderate-Income Solar Policy Basics. www.nrel.gov/state-local-tribal/lmi-solar.html.Google Scholar
North Carolina State University. 2021. Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency (DSIRE). Raleigh: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Eric, Barbose, Galen, Wiser, Ryan, Forrester, Sydney, and Darghouth, Naïm. 2021. “The Impact of Policies and Business Models on Income Equity in Rooftop Solar Adoption.” Nature Energy 6 (1): 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott E. 2006. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2016. “Power in Historical Institutionalism.” Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, 124–41.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E., and van der Linde, Claas. 1995. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokop, Viktor, Gerstlberger, Wolfgang, Vrabcová, Pavla, Zapletal, David, and Sein, Yee Yee. 2023. “Does Being Stricter Mean Doing Better? Different Effects of Environmental Policy Stringency on Quality of Life, Green Innovation, and International Cooperation.” Heliyon 9 (5): e16388. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabe, Barry. 2010. “Racing to the Top, the Bottom, or the Middle of the Pack? The Evolving State Government Role in Environmental Protection.” In Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, ed. Schneider, Stephen H., Rosencranz, Armin, and Niles, John O., 27–50. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Robert L. 1985. “Diffusion Research Traditions and the Spread of Policy Innovations in a Federal System.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 15 (4): 1–28.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929–1930 Revision of the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2012. “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 788–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrimali, Gireesh, Chan, Gabriel, Jenner, Steffen, Groba, Felix, and Indvik, Joe. 2015. “Evaluating Renewable Portfolio Standards for In-State Renewable Deployment: Accounting for Policy Heterogeneity.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 4 (2): 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, Yutong, and Stephens, Jennie C.. 2021. “Energy Justice Through Solar: Constructing and Engaging Low-Income Households.” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 3:632020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solar Energy Industries Association. 2023. Solar Industry Research Data.Google Scholar
Solomon, Barry D., and Zhou, Shan. 2021. “Renewable Portfolio Standards: Do Voluntary Goals vs. Mandatory Standards Make a Difference?” Review of Policy Research 38 (2): 146–63.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Samuel. 2023. “Policy Feedback and Interdependence in American Federalism: Evidence from Rooftop Solar Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 21 (2): 462–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, Gregory C. 2000. “Understanding Carbon Lock-In.” Energy Policy 28 (12): 817–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Energy Information Administration. 2021. Independent Statistics and Analysis.Google Scholar
US Energy Information Administration. 2022. “Five States Updated or Adopted New Clean Energy Standards in 2021.” www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=51118.Google Scholar
US White House. 2022. “Justice40 Initiative.” www.whitehouse.gov/environmentaljustice/justice40.Google Scholar
Weible, Christopher M., and Sabatier, Paul A.. 2017. “Theories of the Policy Process.” European Policy Analysis 3 (2): 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiser, Ryan, Porter, Kevin, and Grace, Robert. 2005. “Evaluating Experience with Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 10:237–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Haitao, and Powers, Nicholas. 2010. “Do State Renewable Portfolio Standards Promote In-State Renewable Generation?” Energy Policy 38 (2): 1140–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Shan, and Solomon, Barry D.. 2020. “Do Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States Stunt Renewable Electricity Development Beyond Mandatory Targets?” Energy Policy 140:111377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Shan, Solomon, Barry D., and Brown, Marilyn A.. 2024. “The Spillover Effect of Mandatory Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (25): e2313193121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Datta supplementary material

Datta supplementary material
Download Datta supplementary material(File)
File 151.3 KB