Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:35:49.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Online Teaching and Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Kerstin Hamann ,
Philip H. Pollock ,
Gary E. Smith  and
Bruce M. Wilson
Kerstin Hamann
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Philip H. Pollock
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Gary E. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Bruce M. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Profession Symposium: Assessment in Political Science Redux
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 107 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2013. Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2014 (January). Grade Change: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2015 (February). Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
Botsch, Robert E., and Botsch, Carol S.. 2012. “Audiences and Outcomes in Online and Traditional American Government Classes Revisited.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 493–500.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2008. “Comparing Modes of Instruction: The Relative Efficacy of On-Line and In-Person Teaching for Student Learning.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (1): 387–91.Google Scholar
Glader, Paul. 2013. “Dropout Redemption: Online Courses Can Increase College Graduation Rates.” Forbes Magazine. Available at www.forbes.com/sites/berlinschoolofcreativeleadership/2013/12/14/dropout-redemption-online-courses-as-a-tool-to-increase-college-graduation-rates/print. Accessed July 18, 2015.Google Scholar
Glazier, Rebecca. 2014. “Satire and Efficacy in the Political Science Classroom.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (4): 867–872 .Google Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin. 2015. “Curricular and Program Assessment Techniques in the United States.” In Handbook of Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations, ed. Ishiyama, John, Miller, Will, and Simon, Eszter, 74–84. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip III, and Wilson, Bruce. 2009. “Learning from ‘Listening’ to Peers in Online Political Science Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 5 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip H., Wilson, Bruce, and Smith, Gary. 2015. “The Digital Revolution in Political Science Education and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, September 3–6.Google Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip H., and Smith, Gary E.. 2015. “What Do We Know about Teaching and Learning in Political Science in the Digital Era?” APSA Teaching and Learning Conference, Washington, DC, January 16–18.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Sen, Maya. 2013a. “A Symposium on ‘The Troubled Future of Colleges and Universities’: Editors’ Introduction.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1): 81–2.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Sen, Maya. 2013b. “The Troubled Future of Colleges and Universities.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1): 83–9.Google Scholar
Means, Barbara, Toyama, Yukie, Murphy, Robert, Bakia, Marianne, and Jones, Karla. 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Mary Jane C. 2013. “Simulating in Cyberspace: Designing and Assessing Simple Role-Playing Activities for Online Regional Studies Courses.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (2): 121–33.Google Scholar
Pollock, Philip H., Hamann, Kerstin, and Wilson, Bruce. 2005. “Teaching and Learning Online: Assessing the Effect of Gender Context on Active Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Pollock, Philip H., Hamann, Kerstin, and Wilson, Bruce M.. 2009. “Assessment in the Online Environment.” In Assessment in Political Science, ed. Deardorff, Michelle, Hamann, Kerstin, and Ishiyama, John, 197–216. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
RITE (Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness). N.d. “Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation.” University of Central Florida. Available at https://online.ucf.edu/research/dl-impact-evaluation.Google Scholar
Roscoe, Douglas D. 2012. “Comparing Student Outcomes in Blended and Face-to-Face Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Schnurr, Matthew A., De Santo, Elizabeth, and Craig, Rachael. 2013. “Using a Blended-Learning Approach to Simulate the Negotiation of a Multilateral Environmental Agreement.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (2): 109–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Elizabeth S. and Bressler, Alison. 2013. “Who Taught You to Talk Like That? The University and Online Political Discourse.” Journal of Political Science Education 4 (9): 453–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stover, William James. 2005. “Teaching and Learning Empathy: An Interactive Online Diplomatic Simulation of Middle East Conflict.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (2): 207–19.Google Scholar
Trudeau, Robert H. 2005. “Get Them to Read, Get Them to Talk: Using Discussion Forums to Enhance Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3): 289–322.Google Scholar
Turner, Charles C. 2005. “A New Honesty for a New Game: Distinguishing Cheating from Learning in a Web-Based Testing Environment.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (2): 163–74.Google Scholar
Williams, Leonard, and Lahman, Mary. 2011. “Online Discussion, Student Engagement, and Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1): 143–62.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M., Pollock, Philip H. III, and Hamann, Kerstin. 2006. “Partial Online Instruction and Gender-Based Differences in Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study of American Government.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (2): 335–9.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce, Pollock, Philip III, and Hamann, Kerstin. 2007. “Does Active Learning Enhance Learner Outcomes? Evidence from Discussion Participation in Online Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 3 (1): 131–42.Google Scholar
Young, Candace C., Cartwright, Debra K., and Rudy, Michael. 2014. “To Resist, Acquiesce, or Internalize: Departmental Responsiveness to Demands for Outcomes Assessment.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Zeiser, Pamela A., Fuchs, Doris, and Engelkamp, Stephan. 2013. “Discussions across Borders: A German–American Partnership.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (4): 474–86.Google Scholar