Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:26:15.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction—The Brown Decision at Age 50: Limitations and Emanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2004

Christopher H. Foreman
Affiliation:
University of Maryland

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkin Jack M. 2001Brown as Icon.” In What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision, ed. Jack M. Balkin. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Irons Peter. 2002 Jim Crow's Children: The Broken Promise of the Brown Decision. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Orfield Gary, Susan E. Eaton, and and the Harvard Project on School Desegregation. 1996 Dismantling Desegregation: The Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Patterson James T. 2001 Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg Gerald N. 1991 The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom Stephan, and Abigail Thernstrom. 1997 American in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar