Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:57:05.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpersonal Networks and Democratic Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Anand E. Sokhey  and
Paul A. Djupe
Anand E. Sokhey
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Paul A. Djupe
Affiliation:
Denison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some of the most fundamental concerns about democratic politics involve information—who has access to it, how do individuals get it, and of what quality and type is it? The answers to each of these questions invariably involve other people, and it is for this reason that modern democracy is unthinkable save in terms of social networks.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 55 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barabas, Jason. 2004. “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1987. “Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (6): 1287–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, A. 2006. Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., Searing, Donald D., and Crewe, Ivor M.. 2002. “The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 21–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Cook, Fay Lomax, and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2004. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Reviews of Political Science 7: 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A. 2009. “Political Pluralism and the Information Search: Determinants of Group Opinionation.” Political Research Quarterly. Published electronically September 29, 2009. doi:10.1177/1065912909346742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2006. “The Resourceful Believer: Generating Civic Skills in Church.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 116–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2009. “Social Network Core and Periphery: The Results of Experimentation in Name Generation.” Paper presented at the Networks in Political Science Conference, Cambridge, MA, June 11–13.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., Sokhey, Anand E., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2007. “Present but Not Accounted For? Gender Differences in Civic Resource Acquisition.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 906–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finifter, Ada. 1974. “The Friendship Group as a Protective Environment for Social Deviants.” American Political Science Review 68: 607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Christopher P. 1993. The Impact of Churches on Political Behavior. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael W., and Dantico, Marilyn K.. 1982. “Political Participation and the Neighborhood Social Context Revisited.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1979. “Political Participation and the Neighborhood Social Context.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (3): 579–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1984. “Political Loyalties and Social Class Ties: The Mechanisms of Contextual Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (2): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 2001. “The Social Communication of Political Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 425–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell J., and Levine, Jeffrey. 1995. “Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 1025–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Beck, Paul A., Dalton, Russell J., Levine, Jeffrey, and Morgan, William. 1998. “Ambiguity, Distorted Messages, and Nested Environmental Effects on Political Communication.” Journal of Politics 60 (4): 996–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. 2004. The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Levine, Jeffrey, Morgan, William, and Sprague, John. 1998. “Election Campaigns, Social Communication, and the Accessibility of Perceived Discussant Preference.” Political Behavior 20 (4): 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2008. “Moths, Flames, and Political Engagement: Managing Disagreement within Communication Networks.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse, and Osborn, Tracy. 2004. “Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks.” Political Psychology 25 (1): 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1993. “Citizens, Contexts, and Politics.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada W., 281–303. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communications: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Sprague, John, and Levine, Jeffrey. 2000. “The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy.” American Political Science Review 94: 641–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1955. Personal Influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, Christopher B. 1992. “Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Christopher B. 1998. “The Behavioral Consequences of Political Discussion: Another Look at Discussant Effects on Vote Choice.” Journal of Politics 60: 231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Klofstad, Casey A. 2007. “Talk Leads to Recruitment: How Discussions about Politics and Current Events Increase Civic Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klofstad, Casey A., McClurg, Scott D., and Rolfe, Meredith. 2009. “Measurement of Political Discussion Networks: A Comparison of Two ‘Name Generator’ Procedures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (3): 462–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klofstad, Casey, Sokhey, Anand E., and McClurg, Scott. 2010. “Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 22–25.Google Scholar
Knoke, David. 1990. Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economies of Associations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lake, Ronald La Due, and Huckfeldt, Robert. 1998. “Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation.” Political Psychology 19 (3): 567–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Katz, Nancy, and Chetkovich, Carol. 2007. “Networks and Political Attitudes: Structure, Influence, and Co-Evolution.” Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 29–September 2.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 1990. “Social Interaction and Contextual Influences on Political Participation.” American Politics Quarterly 18 (4): 459–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, M. 1990. “Speaking of Politics: Individual Conversational Choice, Public Opinion, and the Prospects for Deliberative Democracy.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. Ferejohn, J. and Kuklinski, J., 59–99. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, and Brown, Courtney. 1987. “Political Context and Attitude Change.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClurg, Scott D. 2003. “Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (4): 449–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClurg, Scott D. 2006a. “The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 737–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClurg, Scott D. 2006b. “Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement, and Political Talk on Electoral Participation.” Political Behavior 28 (4): 349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, William, with Smith, Robert B., and Ferguson, Jack. 1963. “A Theory of Informal Social Influence.” In Formal Theories of Mass Behavior, ed. McPhee, William, 74–103. London: Collier-Macmillan, Free Press.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2005. “Bringing the Group Back Into Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 26 (4): 637–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey. 1995. “Media Exposure and Political Discussion in U.S. Elections.” Journal of Politics 57: 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2002a. “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 838–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2002b. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96: 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana, and Mondak, Jeff. 2006. “The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 140–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, David W. 2005. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. 2004. “Democracy On-Line: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6: 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent, Cappella, J., and Nir, Lilach. 2002. “Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?” Political Communication 19 (1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1966. “Political Attitudes and the Local Community.” American Political Science Review 60: 640–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richey, Sean. 2008. “The Autoregressive Influence of Social Network Political Knowledge on Voting Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, David R., and Meyer, Marshall W.. 1974. “The Social Context of Political Partisanship.” In Social Ecology, ed. Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein, 217–32. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sokhey, Anand, and McClurg, S.. 2008. “Social Networks and Correct Voting.” Paper presented at the Harvard Networks Conference, Cambridge, MA, June 13–14.Google Scholar
Sprague, John. 1982. “Is There a Micro-Theory Consistent with Contextual Analysis?” In Strategies of Political Inquiry, ed. Ostrom, Elinor, 99–121. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2008. Republic.Com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert. 1963. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. Trans. V. Hammarling. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis De. 1994 [1840]. Democracy in America. 2. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis E., and Hill, Samuel S. Jr. 1988. “Churches as Political Communities.” American Political Science Review 82: 531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherford, S. 1982. “Interpersonal Networks and Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipp, John F., and Smith, Joel. 1979. “The Structure of Electoral Political Participation.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (1): 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan, Dasovic, Josip, and Fitzgerald, Jennifer. 2007. Partisan Families: The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar