Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:24:13.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Has Political Theory Become More Political? Evidence and Stakes for Future Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

J. Mohorčich Open the ORCID record for J. Mohorčich [Opens in a new window]
J. Mohorčich*
Affiliation:
Lehman College, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents evidence for a secular increase in political engagement in political theory from 1974 to 2019 and analyzes the implications of this growth. Analysis of 385 theory articles published across three periods (i.e., 1974–1976, 2005–2007, and 2017–2019) found a near doubling in topicality among theory articles published in Polity, American Political Science Review, and Political Theory since the 1970s. This change has been substantial, statistically significant, and previously unnoted in the literature. I suggest that the shift toward topicality entails and is entailed by the production of “real events” amenable to and consistent with the theoretical approaches in which successive generations of theorists have been trained. Finally, I explain this shift toward topicality with respect to theory’s responsiveness to real events and to rising levels of professionalization within the field.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 497 - 503
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akudolu, Lilian-Rita, and Adeyemo, Kolawole Samuel. 2018. “Research and PhD Capacities in Sub-Saharan Africa: Nigeria Report.” British Council & DAAD. www2.daad.de/medien/der-daad/analysen-studien/research_and_phd_capacities_in_sub-saharan_africa_-_nigeria_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2006. “American Nightmare: Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization.” Political Theory 34 (6): 690–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591706293016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Carl. 1971. Democracy. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Eagan, Kevin, Stolzenberg, Ellen Bara, Lozano, Jennifer Berdan, Aragon, Melissa C., Suchard, Maria Ramirez, and Hurtado, Sylvia. 2014. “Undergraduate Teaching Faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI Faculty Survey.” Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael L. 2006. “Esotericism Ancient and Modern: Strauss Contra Straussianism on the Art of Political–Philosophical Writing.” Political Theory 34 (1): 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591705277770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, James M. 1976. “Machiavelli’s Prince & Alchemical Transformation: Action & the Archetype of Regeneration.” Polity 8 (4): 503–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 1995. “The Strange Silence of Political Theory.” Political Theory 23 (4): 636–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591795023004005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundmueller, Michelle M. 2018. “On the Importance of Penelope.” Polity 50 (1): 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/695416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Joseph H., and Clark, Rebecca R.. 2006. “The Solitary Walker in the Political World: The Paradoxes of Rousseau and Deep Ecology.” Political Theory 34 (1): 62–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591705279076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magness, Philip. 2016. “For-Profit Universities and the Roots of Adjunctification in US Higher Education.” Liberal Education 102 (2). www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/2016/spring/magness.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 2007. “Machiavelli’s Political Trials and ‘The Free Way of Life.’” Political Theory 35 (4): 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707302195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohorčich, J. 2021. “People Die in Six Ways and Each Is Politics: Infrastructure and the Possible.” Contemporary Political Theory, September 3. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00518-5.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2019. “Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities.” NSF 20-301. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf20301/report.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrag, Francis. 1975. “The Child’s Status in the Democratic State.” Political Theory 3 (4): 441–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/009059177500300407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, Rachel, and White, Stephen K.. 2017. “Deliberation, Accountability, and Legitimacy: A Case Study of Police-Community Forums.” Polity 49 (4): 489–517. https://doi.org/10.1086/693919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Adam K. 2019. “When Open Borders Must Stay Open: Expectations and Freedom of Movement.” Polity 51 (2). https://doi.org/10.1086/702557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar