Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:28:22.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elite Recruitment and Political Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Shigeko N. Fukai  and
Haruhiro Fukui
Shigeko N. Fukai
Affiliation:
Auburn University
Haruhiro Fukui
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Why should one study elite recruitment and political leadership in Japan? Because, our answer would go, we live in a world of ever deepening interdependence among nations where the peace, security, and prosperity of each is greatly influenced by policies and actions of another. This is particularly true when the latter is an economic superpower like Japan, the largest creditor nation and aid donor in the world of the early 1990s with a gross national product equal to about fifteen per cent of the world's total. Who makes Japanese domestic and foreign policies and how they are made has important implications for the welfare of other nations, including the United States, which maintains what a former American ambassador to Japan, Mike Mansfield, called the “most important bilateral relationship” in the world.

“Elite” and “leadership” are two concepts that help us identify and analyze those who play central roles in a nation's policymaking process. Commonplace as they are in the vocabulary of both modern political science and the mass media, these words are often used ambiguously and interchangeably. They are, however, etymologically distinctive words that can serve us as useful analytical tools only if they are clearly and distinctively defined. In the discussion that follows, we use “elite” to refer to a group of individuals who hold privileged positions in society or organizations and “leadership” to refer to the exercise of power, broadly defined, to lead others in collective action. As William Welsh has suggested, elites are thus “set apart from the rest of society by their preeminence in political and governmental hierarchies,” while leadership means “ability to mobilize human resources in pursuit of specific goals.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 25 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, Lewis. 1975. Saints and Samurai: The Political Culture of the American and Japanese Elites. New Haven: Yale University Press. A comparative study of Japanese and American elite political cultures based on a modest set of survey data collected circa 1970.Google Scholar
Baerwald, Hans H. 1986. Party Politics in Japan. Boston: Allen & Unwin. A text on Japanese parliamentary and electoral politics with special attention to power politics within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald. 1988. The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. The latest and an exceptionally informative and insightful text on the Liberal Democratic Party and the transformation of Japanese politics under that party's uninterrupted rule.Google Scholar
Ike, Nobutaka. 1978. A Theory of Japanese Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. An interpretation of Japanese politics as an “investment model” democracy that focuses on its pragmatic, materialistic, and instrumental proclivities.Google Scholar
Ishida, Takeshi, and Krauss, Ellis S., eds. 1989. Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. A collection of essays on the strengths and limitations of democracy in contemporary Japan as revealed in its political, social and economic institutions and practices.Google Scholar
Kim, Paul S. 1988. Japan's Civil Service System: Its Structure, Personnel, and Politics. New York: Greenwood Press. By far the most detailed and comprehensive account of the Japanese civil service system, including a summary of its prewar history and postwar Occupation-initiated reform and an exhaustive description of its contemporary rules and practices.Google Scholar
Koh, B. C. 1989. Japan's Administrative Elite. Berkeley: University of California Press. A detailed and comprehensive study of higher civil servants in contemporary Japan with special attention to the systems of recruitment and promotion, patterns of socialization and interaction, and types of rewards.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, Akira. 1969. Higher Civil Servants in Postwar Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press. The first systematic and detailed study ever published of the socioeconomic backgrounds and career patterns of higher civil servants in early postwar Japan, up to the end of the 1950s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, Terry Edward, ed. 1982. Political Leadership in Contemporary Japan. Michigan Papers in Japanese Studies, No. 1. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, the University of Michigan. A collection of essays on the practice and style of leadership exercised by Japanese ruling and opposition party leaders, local politicians, and influential individuals without formal office or title.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Robert M. Jr., 1967. Imperial Japan's Higher Civil Service Examinations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Still the most detailed and comprehensive study available in English of the higher civil service examination system in prewar Japan.Google Scholar
Takane, Masaaki. 1981. The Political Elite in Japan. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, The University of California. A translation of a 1976 Japanese-language book on the determinants and patterns of social mobility and the behavior and performance of the political elite in modern Japan.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney et al. , 1987. Elites and the Idea of Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. A comparative study based on survey data of the ideas of equality held by members of various elites and actual practices in Japan, Sweden, and the United States.Google Scholar