Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:02:57.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dead Law: The Federal Election Finance Regulations, 1974–1996

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Clyde Wilcox
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Wesley Joe
Affiliation:
Georgetown University

Extract

In the aftermath of the 1996 election campaigns, scholars, journalists, policymakers, and campaign finance professionals alike declared the House election financing system “broken” and “out of control.” That cycle saw party officials raising unprecedented amounts of “soft money” and directing it into specific federal campaigns. Coalitions of interest groups spent tens of millions of dollars attacking or defending candidates in “issue advocacy” campaigns, and disclosed neither their spending nor the sources of their funds to the Federal Election Commission. Groups like the Christian Coalition distributed tens of millions of “non-partisan” voter guides with thinly-disguised endorsements of candidates, again without disclosing their activity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buckley v. Valeo. 1976. 424 U.S. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citizens' Research Foundation. 1997. New Realities, New Thinking: Report of the Task Force on Campaign Finance Reform. Los Angeles: Citizens' Research Foundation, University of Southern California. (Available online at http://www.usc.edu/dept/CRF/DATA/newrnewt.htm)Google Scholar
Gugliotta, Guy, and Chinoy, Ira. 1997. “Outsiders Made Erie Ballot a National Battle.” The Washington Post February 10, A1.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., Taylor, Paul, Malbin, Michael J., and Corrado, Anthony Jr. New Campaign Finance Reform Proposals for the 105th Congress. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. (Available online at http://www.brookings.edu/GS/NEWCFR/reform.htm)Google Scholar
Pew Center for the People and the Press. 1997. “Politics, Morality, Entitlements Sap Confidence.” Washington, DC: Pew Center for the People and the Press.Google Scholar