Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:17:21.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contra Koza

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Darin DeWitt  and
Thomas Schwartz
Darin DeWitt
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Thomas Schwartz
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three of our arguments drew no objection from Dr. Koza. One is that plurality rule—the heart of his proposed reform—can be anti-majoritarian. In our three-candidate example, Libby was the plurality favorite but Maude beat each of her rivals, Libby included, by a majority. A plurality can be a majority, of course, but the Electoral College has never reversed a popular majority.

Type
Controversy: The National Popular Vote Plan
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 805 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2014. “Long-Term Trends and Short-Term Forecasts: The Transformation of US Presidential Elections in an Age of Polarization” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (2): 289–292.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen D. and Reeves, Andrew. 2012. “Using Recounts to Measure the Accuracy of Vote Tabulations: Evidence from New Hampshire Elections 1946–2002.” In Confirming Elections: Creating Confidence and Integrity through Election Auditing, eds. Hall, Thad E., Atkeson, Lonna, and Michael Alvarez, R.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar