Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:09:50.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conclusion: What we Learned and the Path Forward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Lauren C. Bell Open the ORCID record for Lauren C. Bell [Opens in a new window]  and
John P. Forren
Lauren C. Bell
Affiliation:
Randolph–Macon College, USA
John P. Forren
Affiliation:
Miami University of Ohio, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Civic Engagement in Political Science
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 403 - 405
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archer, Candace C., and Miller, Melissa K.. 2011. “Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 429–34.Google Scholar
Levin-Waldman, Oren. 2012. “Rising Income Inequality and Declining Civic Participation.” Challenge 55 (3): 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Council for the Social Studies. 2016. “NCSS Position Statement: A Vision of Powerful Teaching and Learning in the Social Studies.” Social Education 80 (3): 180–82.Google Scholar
Straugh, Jeremy Brooke, and Andriot, Angie L.. 2011. “Education, Civic Patriotism, and Democratic Citizenship: Unpacking the Education Effect on Political Involvement.” Sociological Forum 26 (3): 556–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar