Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:41:21.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1988 Presidential Nominations: Whatever Happened to Momentum?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Lee Sigelman
Lee Sigelman*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Big Mo’ has just switched uniforms.

—Dandy Don Meredith, football commentator

According to a staple item of conventional wisdom about the politics of presidential nominations, it has become essential for a candidate to perform well early in the primary and caucus season, weighing in with an early victory or, what is probably more important, an unexpectedly strong early showing. Toward that end, serious presidential aspirants now gear up their campaigns years in advance of the first primaries and caucuses, in the belief that in order to stand any chance of being nominated, they must establish from the very outset the viability of their candidacy. Since nomination contests are, in effect, winnowing processes (see, e.g., Matthews, 1978), presidential aspirants who fail to establish their credibility very early in the race may find themselves left at the post, their supporters having forsaken them for other, seemingly more electable candidates. On the other hand, those who do well early in the fray live to fight another day. Indeed, they are likely, according to a related bit of conventional wisdom, to hop aboard a victory bandwagon, with impressive early performances enhancing their support and this increased support in turn bolstering their subsequent performance.

Taken in tandem, the ideas that it is vital to do well early and that doing well becomes self-perpetuating form the keystones of momentum-based interpretations of the presidential nomination process.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 35 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conventional Wisdom Watch. 1988. Newsweek (January 18-May 2).Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1978. Winnowing: The News Media and the 1976 Presidential Nominations. In Barber, James David, ed., Race for the Presidency: The Media and the Nominating Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mayer, William G. 1987. The New Hampshire Primary: A Historical Overview. In Orren, Gary R. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Orren, Gary R. 1985. The Nomination Process: Vicissitudes of Candidate Selection. In Nelson, Michael, ed., The Elections of 1984. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar