Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:08:27.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamic linkage between the binding of protons and inhibitors to HIV-1 protease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

JOANNA TRYLSKA
Affiliation:
Department of Biophysics, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland
JAN ANTOSIEWICZ
Affiliation:
Department of Biophysics, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland
MACIEJ GELLER
Affiliation:
Department of Biophysics, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland
C. NICHOLAS HODGE
Affiliation:
The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0353
RONALD M. KLABE
Affiliation:
The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0353
MARTHA S. HEAD
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 9600 Gudelsky Dr., Rockville, Maryland 20850-3479
MICHAEL K. GILSON
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 9600 Gudelsky Dr., Rockville, Maryland 20850-3479
Get access

Abstract

The aspartyl dyad of free HIV-1 protease has apparent pKas of ∼3 and ∼6, but recent NMR studies indicate that the aspartyl dyad is fixed in the doubly protonated form over a wide pH range when cyclic urea inhibitors are bound, and in the monoprotonated form when the inhibitor KNI-272 is bound. We present computations and measurements related to these changes in protonation and to the thermodynamic linkage between protonation and inhibition. The Poisson–Boltzmann model of electrostatics is used to compute the apparent pKas of the aspartyl dyad in the free enzyme and in complexes with four different inhibitors. The calculations are done with two parameter sets. One assigns ε = 4 to the solute interior and uses a detailed model of ionization; the other uses ε = 20 for the solute interior and a simplified representation of ionization. For the free enzyme, both parameter sets agree well with previously measured apparent pKas of ∼3 and ∼6. However, the calculations with an internal dielectric constant of 4 reproduce the large pKa shifts upon binding of inhibitors, but the calculations with an internal dielectric constant of 20 do not. This observation has implications for the accurate calculation of pKas in complex protein environments.

Because binding of a cyclic urea inhibitor shifts the pKas of the aspartyl dyad, changing the pH is expected to change its apparent binding affinity. However, we find experimentally that the affinity is independent of pH from 5.5 to 7.0. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Protein Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)