No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Thursday, 9th March, 1911
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Proceedings
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1911
References
page 371 note 1 Proceedings, xx. 197.
page 372 note 1 Ancient Stone Implements, 2nd ed., p. 622.
page 372 note 2 Journal of the Anthropological Institute, vol. xxii, Aug. and Nov., 1892, pp. 66–98.
page 373 note 1 Ancient Stone Implements, 2nd ed.; p. 290.
page 374 note 1 Ancient, Stone Implements, 2nd ed., p. 357. This is of the same type as a perfect one found near Eastbourne, figured by Sir John Evans.
page 376 note 1 Mr. Reginald Smith, in the discussion of the report, said he was of opinion that the urn was later, and probably belonged to the Hallstatt (earliest Iron) Period.
page 377 note 1 Proceedings, xviii. 294.
page 377 note 2 Sussex Arch. Collns., xi. 141.
page 379 note 1 Proceedings, xviii. 23.
page 379 note 2 Sussex Arch. Collns., xvi. 52.
page 380 note 1 Vol. liii, pp. 131–7.
page 381 note 1 Proceedings, xviii. 297.
page 383 note 1 Now Lord Cowdray.
page 384 note 1 L'Anthrnpologie, 1908, 559; 1901, 113.
page 385 note 1 Sehested, Arch. Undersög., pl. xiii, xv, xx; P. du Chatellier, La poterie… en Armorique, pl. 15, no. 3; pl. 16, fig. 7; Voss, Zeitschr. für Ethnologie, 1903, 188.