Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T06:04:25.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Report on the Medusæ found in the Firth of Clyde (1901–1902)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Edward T. Browne
Edward T. Browne
Affiliation:
Zoological Research Laboratory, University College, London
Get access

Extract

Records relating to the occurrence of medusæ in the Firth of Clyde have not been numerous, though its waters have long been a noted resort for marine naturalists. Forbes, in his Monograph on the British Naked-eyed Medusæ, states that he paid special attention to the medusæ of the Clyde, and that those which he collected while on a yachting cruise in the autumn of 1839 were the foundation of his well-known monograph. Amongst those who have made additions to the list of species I may mention the names of Landsborough, Alder, Allman, Herdman, and two well-known foreigners, Claparède and Haeckel. In June 1902 Dr Clemens Hartlaub, of Heligoland, made a short stay at the Millport Biological Laboratory, solely for the purpose of collecting medusæ, but the complete results of his labours have not yet been published.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , 1906 , pp. 738 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Agassiz, A., 1865, “North American Acaleph” Illus. Catal. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, No. 2, Cambridge, U.S.A. Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1860, “On the Structure of Carduella cyathiformis ,” Trans. Micro. Soc. London, vol. viii. pp. 125–128, pl. v.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1871–1872, A Monograph on the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids, Ray Soc., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Association, 1901, Fauna, Flora, and Geology of the Clyde Area, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1895, “Report on the Medusæ of the Liverpool Marine Biological District,” Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., vol. ix. pp. 243–286. Reprinted in Fauna of Liverpool Bay, vol. v.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1896, “On British Hydroids and Medusæ,” Proc. Zool. Soc., pp. 459–500, pls. xvi., xvii., London.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1898, “On British Medusæ,” Proc. Zool. Soc., 1897, pp. 816–835, Pls. xlviii., xlix.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1900, “The Fauna and Flora of Valencia Harbour, Ireland,” Report on the Medusæ (1895–1898), Proc R. Irish Acad., ser. 3, vol. v. pp. 694–763, Pls. xx., xxi.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1903, “Report on some Medusæ from Norway and Spitzbergen,” Bergens Mus. Aarbog., 1903, No. 4, 36 pp., 5 Pls.Google Scholar
Busch, W., 1851, Beobacht. ueber Anatomie und Entwickelung einiger wirbellosen Seethiere, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, C., 1881, “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Geryonopsidenund Eucopiden-Entwickelung,” Arbeit. Zool. Instit., Wien, Bd. iv. pp. 89–120, taf. x.-xiii.Google Scholar
Forbes, E., 1841, “Contributions to British Actinology,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. vii. pp. 81–85, pl. i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E., 1848, A Monograph of the British Naked-eyed Medusiœ, Ray Soc.Google Scholar
Forbes, and Goodsir, , 1851, “On some Remarkable Marine Invertebrates new to British Seas,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xx. pp. 307–315, Pls. x.-xi.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1853, A Naturalist's Rambles on the Devonshire Coast, London.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1856, Tenby: A Seaside Holiday, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeckel, E., 1879–1880. Das System der Medusen, 2 vols., Jena.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1897, “Die Hydromedusen Helgolands,” Wiss. Meeresunter, N. F., Bd. ii., Abt. Helgoland, pp. 449–536, 10 tafn.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1904, “Bericht, über eine zoologische Studienreise nach Frankreich, Gross-Britannien, und Norwegen, ausgeführt im Frühjahre 1902,” Wiss. Meeresunter, N. F.. Bd. v., Abt. Helgoland, pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
Herdman, W. A., 1880, “On the Invertebrate Fauna of Lamlash Bay,” Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., vol. v. pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1868, A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes, Ray Soc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincks, T., 1872, “On the Hydroid Lar sabellarum, Gosse, and its Reproduction,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. x. pp. 313–17, pl. xix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, G., 1847, A History of British Zoophytes, 2nd edit., London.Google Scholar
Maas, O., 1897, “Die Medusen” (“Albatross” Expedition during 1891), Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. xxiii. pp. 1–92, 15 pls.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Assoc., 1904, “Plymouth Marine Invertebrate Fauna,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. vii. pp. 155–298.Google Scholar
Romanes, G., 1876–1877, “An Account of some New Species, Varieties, and Monstrous Forms of Medusæ,” Journ. Linn. Soc., vol. xii. (Zool.) pp. 525–531, vol. xiii. pp. 190–194, Pls. xv.-xvi., London.Google Scholar
Russell, E. S., 1904, “Notes on Depastrum cyathiforme ,” Ann., Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. xiii. pp. 62–65, pl. v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, M., 1835, Beskrivelser og Iagttagelser, Bergen.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1846, Fauna littoralis Norvegiæ, fasc. i., Christiania.Google Scholar
Will, F., 1844, Horæ tergestinœ, Leipzig.Google Scholar