Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:49:33.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Tetrabothrium torulosum and Tetrabothrium auriculatum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

O. von Linstow
Affiliation:
Göttingen
Get access

Extract

In my report on the Entozoa, brought home by the “Challenger” expedition, I described two new species as Tetrabothrium torulosum (from Diomedea brachyura) and Tetrabothrium auriculatum (from Thalassœca glacialis and Daption capensis) My descriptions have recently been subjected to adverse criticism by Fuhrmann, who maintains that these two species do not belong to the genus Tetrabothrium, but to the genus Prosthecocotyle; that Tetrabothrium auriculatum is identical with Tetrabothrium (Amphoterocotyle) elegans-heteroclitum, Diesing; that these two Cestodes are not Tetrabothria but typical Tœnice; that my drawing of the scolex of Tetrdbothrium torulosum does not correspond with the actual relations; and that my representation of the masculine genital organs of Tetrabothrium auriculatum is inaccurate.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 158 note *ChallengerReports, Zoology, vol. xxiii. part lxxi. pp. 14, 15, Pl. II. figs. 16–20, 1888.

page 158 note † Zool. Anzeiger, No. 561, pp. 385–388, 1898; Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxii. pp. 641–651, 1899.

page 159 note * Centralblatt f. Bakter., Parasitenk., und Infektionskrankh., Abth. I. Bd. xxvii. pp. 365–6, Jena, 1900.

page 159 note † Denksch. math.–nat. Cl. d. k. Akad. d. Wissenseh., Wien, Bd. xii. p. 28, tab. II. figs. 25–37, 1856.