Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:46:05.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—Æther and the Quantum Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

H. Stanley Allen
Get access

Extract

Extreme supporters of the principle of relativity find no place for an æther. Thus Lord Haldane in discussing the theory of Einstein writes: “Space, as a physical thing with unvarying geometrical properties, is to be banished, just for the same sort of reasons as the æther was banished before it. Only observable things are to be recognised as real in the new system of modern physicists.” On the other hand, many followers of Faraday and Maxwell have regarded æther as the primary real substance; all mass, momentum, or energy being mass, momentum, or energy of the æther. Without entering into a discussion of the significance of physical “reality,” we may, with most physicists, agree to use the concept of æther as giving a model, inadequate though it is at present, for the interpretation of physical phenomena.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 41 , 1922 , pp. 34 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 34 note * Wilson, W., Phil. Mag., vol. xxix, p. 795 (1915); vol. xxxi, p. 156 (1916).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 35 note * Sommerfeld, , Ann. d. Physik, vol. li, pp. 1, 125 (1916).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 35 note † Nicholson, , Monthly Notices, R.A.S., June 1912.Google Scholar

page 35 note ‡ Bohr, , Phil. Mag., vol. xxvi, pp. 1, 476 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 35 note * M'Laren, , Nature, vol. xcii, p. 165 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 36 note * Bernoulli, , Archives des Sciences, vol. xlii, p. 24 (1916).Google Scholar

page 40 note * Maxwell, , Phil. Mag., vol. xxi, pp. 161, 281, 338 (1861).Google Scholar

page 40 note † Kelvin, , Brit. Assoc. Report, p. 473 (1880)Google Scholar; Math. and Phys. Papers, vol. iv, p. 308.

page 40 note ‡ FitzGerald, , Scient. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. (1885).Google Scholar

page 40 note § Hicks, , Brit. Assoc. Report, p. 595 (1895).Google Scholar

page 40 note ║ Kelvin, Math, and Phys. Papers, vol. iii, p. 466.

page 40 note ¶ Larmor, Æther and Matter, Appendix E.

page 41 note * Nature, vol. cvi, p. 196 (1920).Google Scholar

page 41 note † Modern Electrical Theory, First Edition, ch. xiv; Second Edition, Appendix I.

page 42 note * Maxwell, , Phil. Mag., vol. xxiii, p. 12 (1862). It should be noted that this paper is two years earlier than that which gives “A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field.”Google Scholar

page 42 note † Voigt, , Annalen d. Physik, vol. ix, p. 115 (1902).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 42 note ‡ Bohr, Studier over Metallernes Elektrontheori, p. 106.

page 42 note § M'Laren, , Phil. Mag., vol. xxv, p. 43 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 43 note * Benedicks, , Annalen d. Physik, vol. xlii, p. 133 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar