Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:50:49.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of the Lakes of Scotland and Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

C. Wesenberg-Lund
C. Wesenberg-Lund
Affiliation:
Danish Fresh-water Biological Station, Frederiksdal, near K. Lyngby, Denmark
Get access

Extract

In June 1904 I received an invitation from Sir John Murray to visit Scotland and spend three or four weeks in exploring the Scottish lakes, in order to make a comparison between them and the Danish lakes : he was of opinion that such a comparison of the lakes of a highland and a lowland country, which had hitherto not been attempted, would lead to some interesting results. The admirable bathymetrical and physical explorations carried on by Sir John Murray in Scotland, and more especially in Loch Ness, being far advanced, the question as to the scope of the biological observations called for consideration ; so he desired me to indicate, from the impressions derived during my visit, my views as to the most useful lines of investigation that might be taken up with reference to the biology of the Scottish lakes. I was much interested in the task imposed upon me, and at the same time gratified at the prospect of assisting in the design of the biological explorations in the lakes of a foreign country ; and as it was of the greatest significance to me to learn the nature of alpine lakes, I immediately accepted the invitation. I spent three weeks in Scotland,—the first two at, Fort Augustus, on Loch Ness, and the third in Edinburgh. From Fort Augustus I explored the lakes of the Caledonian Canal, and thus became acquainted with alpine lakes; from Edinburgh I explored a few lowland lakes, especially Loch Leven. The steamer Mermaid, belonging to the Marine Biological Station at Millport, fully equipped for deep-sea work, under the direction of Dr Gemmill, was sent into the Caledonian Canal, and many hauls were taken with the dredge and trawl, as well as with different kinds of tow-nets, in Lochs Lochy, Oich, and Ness, down to the greatest depths (500 and 750 feet).

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 1906 , pp. 401 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Literature

1902. Brehm, V., “Zusammensetzung, Verteilung und Periodicität des Zooplankton im Achensee,” Zeitschr. d. Ferdinandeums, Bd. 46, p. 1.Google Scholar
1904. Ekman, S., “Die Phyllopoden, Cladoceren und freilebenden Copepoden der nord-schwedischen Hochgebirge,” Zool. Jahrb., Bd. 21, Abth. Syst., p. 1.Google Scholar
1892–1902. Forel, F. A., “Le Léman,” Monographie limnologique, t. 1–3, Lausanne.Google Scholar
1901. Forel, F. A., “Étude thermique des lacs du Nord de l'Europe,” Arch, des sci. phys. et natur., sér. 4, t. 12, p. 35.Google Scholar
1901. Geikie, A., The Scenery of Scotland. London.Google Scholar
1901. Halbfass, W., “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Pommerschen Seen,” Petermann's Mitteilungen, Erganzungsheft Nr. 136, Gotha.Google Scholar
1903. Holmboe, J., “Planterester i norske torvmyrer,” Videnskab. Selslc. Skri/ter Cliridiania, 1903, Math, naturv. Klasse, No. 2.Google Scholar
1896. Kirchner, D., in Schroter und Kirchner, “Die Vegetation des Bodensees,” Schri.ften d. Vereins für GeschicMe des Bodensee.s und seiner Umgebung, Lindau, I. 1896, II. 1902.Google Scholar
1900. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, F. P., “A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,” Part I., Geogr. Journ., vol. xv. p. 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1901A. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, F. P.,“A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,”, Part II., Geogr. Journ., vol. xvii. p. 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1901B. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, F. P., “A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,”, Part III., Geogr. Journ. No. 1. vol. xvii, p. 289.Google Scholar
1903A. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, L., “A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,”, Part III., Nos. 2–6, Geogr. Journ., vol. xxii. p. 237.Google Scholar
1903B. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, L.,“A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,”, Part III., Nos. 7–9, Geogr. Journ., vol. xxii, p.521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1904A. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, L., “A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,”, Part III., No. 10, Geogr. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1904B. Murray, Sir John and Pullar, L.,“A Bathymetrical Survey of the Fresh-water Lochs of Scotland,”, Part IV., Geogr. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1903. Ostwald, W., “über eine neue theoretische Betrachtungsweise in der Planktologie,” Forschungsber. aus der biolog. Station zu Plön, T. x. p. 1.Google Scholar
1862. Post, H. v., “Studier öfver Nutidens koprogena Jordbildningar: Gyttja, Dy, Torf och Mylla,” Kongl. Svenska Vetenskaps- akad, Handl. N.F., Bd. 4, No. 1.Google Scholar
1890–1899. Scott, T H., “The Invertebrate Fauna of the Inland Waters of Scotland,” Parts I.-IX. Annual Reports of the Fishery Board for Scotland.Google Scholar
1893. Scott, T H., “On some Entomostraca from Castlemilk, near Rutherglen,” Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Glasgow, vol. iv. (N.S.) p. 69.Google Scholar
1892–94. Scott, T H., “The Land and Fresh-water Crustacea of the District around Edinburgh: I. Amphipoda, Isopoda; II. Ostracoda and Copepoda; III. Cladocera,” Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinl/urgh, vol. xi. p. 73; vol. xii. pp. 45, 362.Google Scholar
1899. Scott, T H., “Some Notes on the Fresh-water Entomostraca of Aberdeenshire,” Annals of Scottish Nat. Hist., 1899, p. 216.Google Scholar
1901–1902. Scott, T H., “Notes on some Fresh- and Brackishwater Entomostraca found in Aberdeenshire,” Annals of Scottish Nat. Hist., 1901, p. 157 ; 1902, p. 21.Google Scholar
1903. Scott, T H., “Some Observations on British Fresh-water Harpactids,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. xi. p. 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1903A. Scourfield, D. J., “Synopsis of the Known Species of British Fresh-water Entomostraca.” Journ. Quekett Micr. Club, ser. 2, vol. viii. p. 431.Google Scholar
1903B. Scourfield, D. J.,“Synopsis of the Known Species of British Fresh-water Entomostraca.”, Part II. Copepoda, Journ. Quekett Micr. Club, ser., ser. 2,. vol. viii. p. 531.Google Scholar
1904. Scourfield, D. J., “Synopsis of the Known Species of British Fresh-water Entomostraca. Part I. Cladocera,”, Part III. Ostracoda, Phyllopodar and Branchiura, Journ. Quekett Micr. Club, ser., ser. 2, vol. ix. p. 29.Google Scholar
1901. Steuer, A., “Die Entomostracenfauna deralten Donau’ bei Wien,” Zoolog. Jahrb., Bd. 15, Abth. Syst., p. 1.Google Scholar
1904. Ussing, N., “Danmarks Geologi i almenfatteligt Omrids,” Danmarks geologiske Undersŏgelse, III. R. Nr. 2, Kjöbenhavn.Google Scholar
1904. Voigt, M., “Die Botatorien und Gastrotrichen der Umgebung von Plon,” Forschungsber. aus der biolog. Station zu Plön, T. 11, p. 1.Google Scholar
1895. Warming, E., “Plantesamfund,” Grundtrœk af den ökologiske Plantegengrafi, Kjöbenhavn.Google Scholar
1904. West, W., and West, G. S., “Scottish Fresh-water Plankton, No. I.,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Botany, vol. xxxv. p. 519.Google Scholar
1900. Wesbnberg-Lund, C“Von dem Abhängigkeitsverhältnis zwischen dem Bau der Planktonorganismen und dem spezifischen Gewicht des Süsswassers,” Biolog. Centralbl., Bd. 20, pp. 606, 644.Google Scholar
1901. Wesenberg-Lund, C“Studier over Sökalk, Bönnemalm og Sögytje i danske Indsöer,” with summary of contents, Meddel. fra dansk geol. Foren, Kjöbenhavn, Bd. 7, p. 1.Google Scholar
1902. Wesbnberg-Lund, C “Sur l'existence d'une faune relicte dans le lac de Furesö,” Kong. Danske Videmskab. Selsk. Forhandlinger, 1902, p. 257.Google Scholar
1904. Wesenberg-Lund, C “Plankton Investigations of the Danish Lakes,” Danish Fresh-water Biological Laboratory, Op. 5, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
1900. Zschokke, F., “Die Tierwelt der Hochgebirgseen,” Neite Denkschr. d. Schweiz. naturf. Ges., Zürich, Bd. 37, p. 1Google Scholar