Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:34:02.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—Period of Survival of the Shore-Crab (Carcinus mænas) in Distilled Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Robert K. S. Lim
Robert K. S. Lim
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Physiology, Edinburgh University
Get access

Summary

1. The period of survival in distilled water is shortest with post-moult crabs, longer with pre-moult, and longest with inter-moult.

2. Further, a relatively constant percentage of salts is lost, irrespective of size; hence one of the determining factors in survival is the rate of loss of these salts. The other factor is the rate of osmosis of water, causing œdema.

3. With regard to the moult cycle, the concentration of the blood and the structure of the membranes are seemingly little altered, but the amount of calcium in the latter varies with moult-age, being least in post-moult and most in inter-moult membranes.

4. It is concluded, that the higher the percentage of calcium, the less permeable are the membranes and the longer is the duration of survival.

5. Œdema and loss of salts naturally disturb the tonicity equilibrium of the body fluid, and thus cause death.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 38 , 1919 , pp. 14 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

(1)Abbott, , Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, 1913, vol. xxiv, pp. 169–174.Google Scholar
(2)Bayliss, , Principles of General Physiology, 1915, p. 125.Google Scholar
(3)Couch, , Bell's History of British Stalk-eyed Crustacea, 1853, p. 78.Google Scholar
(4)Cuénot, , Arch. de Biol., 1893–1895, t. xiii, pp. 245–303.Google Scholar
(5)Lillie, , Biol. Bull., 1909, vol. xvii, pp. 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Loeb, , Pflüger's Arch., 1903, Bd. xcvii, S. 394–409.Google Scholar
(7)Meigs, , Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 1913, vol. x, pp. 129–131.Google Scholar
(8)Osterhout, , Science, 1912, vol. xxxv, pp. 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Paul, and Sharpe, , Journ. of Phys., 1916, vol. i, pp. 183–192.Google Scholar
(10)Plateau, , “Rech. physico-chimiques s. 1. articulés aquatiques,” Mém. cour. Acad. Roy. Belgique, 1871, t. xxxvi.Google Scholar
(11)Smith, , Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., 1912, vol. lvii, pp. 251–268.Google Scholar
(12)Smith, , Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., 1913, vol. lix, pp. 267–295.Google Scholar
(13)Tait, , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1917, vol. xxxvii, pp. 50–58.Google Scholar
(14)Tait, , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1917, vol. xxxvii, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
(15)Vitzou, , Arch. Zool. Expér., 1882, t. x, pp. 451–576.Google Scholar