Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T23:08:38.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production and energy flow in the macrobenthos of two sandy beaches in South West India *

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. D. Ansell ,
D. S. McLusky ,
Ann Stirling  and
Ann Trevallion
A. D. Ansell
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Argyllshire.
D. S. McLusky
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Stirling.
Ann Stirling
Affiliation:
D.A.F.S. Marine Laboratory, Torry, Aberdeen.
Ann Trevallion
Affiliation:
D.A.F.S. Marine Laboratory, Torry, Aberdeen.
Get access

Synopsis

Estimates of the rates of secondary production by the individual macrofaunal invertebrates of two Indian beaches are presented and these are combined to give an estimate of the energy flow through the macrobenthos of the two beaches. The production by individual species and by the macrofauna as a whole is compared with that of other tropical, and of temperate beaches, and it is concluded that a similar biomass in the tropical beaches produces a rate of turnover of biomass some ten times that of the temperate beaches. Values of production to biomass ratios (P/B) and of elimination to biomass ratios (E/B) for the invertebrates of sandy substrata in various geographical areas are reviewed and the use of these ratios in comparisons of productivity, and their relationship to mortality and longevity are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , 1978 , pp. 269 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

Ansell, A. D., 1961. Reproduction, growth and mortality of Venus striatula (da Costa) in Kames Bay, Millport. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 41, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D., Sivadas, P. and Narayanan, B., 1973. The ecology of two sandy beaches in southwest India: IV. The biochemical composition of four common invertebrates. Spec. Publs Mar. Biol. Ass. India, 1973 333–348,.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D., Sivadas, P., Narayanan, B., Sankaranarayanan, V. N. and Trevallion, A., 1972. The ecology of two sandy beaches in south-west India. Seasonal changes in physical and chemical factors, and in the macrofauna. Mar. Biol., 17, 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D., Sivadas, P., Narayanan, B. and Trevallion, A., 1972 a. The ecology of two sandy beaches in south-west India. II. Notes on Emerita holthuisi. Mar. Biol., 17, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D., Sivadas, P., Narayanan, B. and Trevallion, A., 1972 a. The ecology of two sandy beaches in south-west India. III. Observations on the populations of Donax incarnatus and Donax spiculum. Mar. Biol., 17, 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D. and Trevallion, A., 1969. Behavioural adaptations of intertidal molluscs from a tropical sandy beach. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 4, 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arntz, W. E., 1971. Biomasse und Produktion des Makrobenthos in den tuferen Teilen der Kieler Bucht in Jahr 1968. Kieler Meeresforsch., 27, 36–72.Google Scholar
Birkett, L., 1959. Production in benthic populations. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer., Unpublished Rep. CM., 42, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Boysen Jensen, P., 1919. Valuation of the Limfjord. I. Studies on the fish food in the Limfjord 1909–1917, its quantity, variation and animal production. Rep. Dan. Biol. Stn, 26, 1–44.Google Scholar
Brawn, U. M., Peer, D. L. and Bentley, R. J., 1968. Caloric content of the standing crop of benthic and epibenthic invertebrates of St Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia. J. Fish. Res. Be! Can., 25, 1803–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. C., Ansell, A. D. and Trevallion, A., (in press). Oxygen consumption by Bullia (Dorsanum) melanoides (Deshayes) and Bullia digitalis Meuschen (Gastropoda, Nassaridae)—an example of non-acclimation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.Google Scholar
Brunswig, D., 1973. Der Nehrungswet Makrobenthischer Fischnahrtiere der Kieler Bucht im Hajresgang Diplomarbeit der Universität Kiel. 62 pp. (Unpublished MS.).Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B., 1963. The biology of Calocaris macandreae (Crustacea: Thallassinidae). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 43,729–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. and Warwick, R. M., 1974. An estimate of benthic macrofaunal production in the offshore mud of the Northumberland coast. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 54, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. V. and Mann, K. H., 1974. Productivity and production: biomass ratios of bivalve and gastropod populations in an eastern Canadian estuary. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 31, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, L. M., 1955. Fluctuations in abundance of the giant scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin), in the Digby Area of the Bay of Fundy. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 12, 797–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondsen, W. T. and Winberg, G. G. (Ed.), 1971. A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary production in fresh water. I.B.P. Handbk, 17.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. R. C., 1974 a. Production ecology of two Caribbean marine ecosystems. I. Physical environment and fauna. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci., 1, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. R. C., 1974 b. Production ecology of two Caribbean marine ecosystems. II. Metabolism and energy flow. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci., 1, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. R. C., 1974 c. Respiration of marine fish and invertebrates from Venezuela. Bol. Inst. Oceanogr. Cumana.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. R. C., Blaxter, J. H. S., Gopalan, V. K. and Mathew, C. V., 1970 a. A comparison of standard oxygen consumption of temperate and tropical bottom-living marine fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 34, 491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. R. C., Steele, J. H. and Trevallion, A., 1970 b. The ecology of O-group plaice and common dabs in Loch Ewe. III. Prey-predator experiments with plaice. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 4, 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englemann, M. D., 1966. Energetics, terrestrial field studies, and animal productivity. Adv. Ecol. Res., 3, 73–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, J. E., 1950. The Pismo clam. Calif. Fish Game, 36, 285–312.Google Scholar
Fraser, T. H., 1967. Contributions to the biology of Tagelus divisus (Tellinacea: Pelecypoda) in Biscayne Bay, Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., 17, 111–132.Google Scholar
Golkov, A. N. and Scarlato, O. A., 1970. Abundance, dynamics and production properties of populations of edible bivalves Mizuhopecten yessoensis and Spisula sachalinensis related to the problem or organization of controllable submarine farms at the western shores of the Sea of Japan. Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresunters., 20, 498–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. H., 1968. Mortality and stability in a low diversity subtropical intertidal community. Ecology, 49, 848–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. H., 1973. Growth and mortality in the arctic intertidal population of Macoma balthica (Pelycopoda, Tellinidae). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 30, 1345–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruffydd, LL. D., 1974. An estimate of natural mortality in an unfished population of the scallop Pecten maximus (L.). J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer., 35, 209–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A., 1967. The interpretation of size frequency distributions in molluscan death assemblages. Palaeontology, 10, 25–42.Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A. and Urquhart, A. E., 1965. The determination of natural mortality and its causes in an exploited population of cockles (Cardium edule L.). Fishery Invest., Lond., 24, (2), 1–40.Google Scholar
Herrington, W. C., 1930. The Pismo clam. Fish. Bull. Calif., 18, 1–69.Google Scholar
Holme, N. A. and McIntyre, A. D., (Ed.), 1971. Methods for the study of marine benthos. I.B.P. Handbk, 16.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. N., 1970. Energy budget for a tidal-flat population of the bivalve Scrobicularia plana (da Costa). J. Anim. Ecol., 39, 537–381.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, C. B., 1952. Efficiency of growth in Mytilus edulis and two gastropod veligers. Nature, Lond., 170, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, O. G. and Brafield, A. E., 1973. The energy relations of the polychaete Neanthes (= Nereis) virens (Sars). J. Anim. Ecol., 42, 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzler, E. J., 1961. Structure and energy flow of a mussel population in a Georgia salt marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr., 6, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A. D. and Eleftheriou, A., 1968. The bottom fauna of a flatfish nursery ground. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 48, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, S. and Lawton, J. H., 1970. Annual production and respiration in animal populations. Nature, Lond., 225, 473–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, K. H., 1965. Energy transformations by a population of fish in the River Thames. J. Anim. Ecol., 34, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, K. H., 1969. The dynamics of aquatic ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res., 6, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massé, H., 1968 a. Etude des variations de la biomasse dans une biocoenose infralittorale de substrat meuble. Reel Trav. Stn Mar. Endoume, 43, 25–31.Google Scholar
Massé, H., 1968 a. Sur la productivité de la biomasse des peuplements marins benthiques. Cah. Biol. Mar., 9, 363–372.Google Scholar
Massé, H., 1971 a. Etude quantitative d'un peuplement de sables fin infralittoraux de l'étang de Berre. Evaluation de la production de quelques especes. Vie Millieu (Suppl.), 22, 329–346.Google Scholar
Massé, H., 1971 b. Contribution a l'étude de la macrofaune de peuplements des sables fins infralittoraux des Côtes de Provence: I.—la Baie de Bandol. Tethys, 2, 783–820.Google Scholar
Massé, H., 1971 c. Etude quantitative de la macrofaune de peuplements des sables fins infralittoraux: II.—la Baie du Prado (Golfe de Marseille). Tethys, 3, 113–158.Google Scholar
Miller, R. J. and Mann, K. H., 1973. Ecological energetics of the seaweed zone in a marine bay on the Atlantic coast of Canada. III. Energy transformations by sea urchins. Mar. Biol., 18, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. J., Mann, K. H. and Scarrett, A. J., 1971. Production potential of a seaweed-lobster community in eastern Canada. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 28, 1733–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, H. and Dunnett, G. M., 1972. Standing crop, productivity and tropic relations of the fauna of the Ythan estuary. In The Estuarine Environment (Barnes, R. S. K. and Green, J., Eds), pp. 86–106. Barking: Appl. Sci. Publishers.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1972. An estimate of carbonate production by macrobenthos in some tropical, softbottom communities. Mar. Biol,. 17, 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B. and Lopez, N. N., 1966. The ecology and productivity of Moira atropus (Lamarck). Bull. Mar. Sci. GulfCaribb., 16, 648–667.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. and Lopez, N. N., 1969. The ecology of Clione cancellata Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., 19, 131–148.Google Scholar
Muus, K., 1973. Settling, growth and mortality of young bivalves in the Øresund. Ophelia, 12, 79–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayer, K. N., 1954. Studies on the growth of the wedge clam. Donax (Latona) cuneatus Linnaeus. Indian J. Fish., 2, 325–348.Google Scholar
Olivier, S. R., Capezzani, D. A. A., Carreto, J. I., Christiansen, H. E., Moreno, V. J., Aizpun de Moreno, J. E. and Penchaszadeh, P. E., 1971. Estructura de la communidad, dinamica de la poblacion, y biologia de la almeja amarilla (Mesodema mactroides Desh. 1854) en Mar Azul (Pdo. de Gral. Madariaga, Bs. As., Argentina). Contr. Inst. Biol. Mar. Mar del Plata, 122, 1–90.Google Scholar
Peer, D. L., 1970. Relation between biomass, productivity and loss to predators in a population of a marine benthic polychaete, Pectinaria hypoborea. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 27, 2143–2153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzias, L. P., 1969. Tellina martinicensis (Mollusca: Bivalvia): Biology and productivity. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., 19, 568–579.Google Scholar
Petrusewitz, K., 1966. Suggested list of more important concepts in productivity studies (definitions, and symbols). In Secondary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems, 1, 51–58. Warszawa-Krakow P.W.N.Google Scholar
Pichon, M., 1967. Contribution a l'étude des peuplements de la zone intertidale sur sables fin et sables. Vaseuz non fixées dans la region de Tuléar. Rec. Trav. Stn Mar. Endoume, Suppl., 7, 57–100.Google Scholar
Rapson, A. M., 1952.The toheroa, Amphidesma ventricosum Gray (Eulamellibranchiata), development and growth. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 3, 170–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, W. E. (Ed.), 1968. Methods of assessment of fish production in fresh waters. I.B.P. Handbk, 3.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1956. Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–54. X. The biology of marine bottom communities. Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., 15, 345–414.Google Scholar
Steele, J. H., 1976. Comparative studies of beaches. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B, 274, 401–415Google Scholar
Steele, J. H., McIntyre, A. D., Edwards, R. R. C. and Trevallion, A., 1970. Interrelations of a young plaice population with its invertebrate food supply. In Animal populations in relation to their food resources, Watson, A. (Ed.), 375–388, Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc., 10, Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. A. and Dickie, L. M., 1954. Annual growth rings and rate of growth of the giant scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) in the Digby area of the Bay of Fundy. J. Fish Res. Bd Can., 11, 660–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassin, B. A., 1973. Peuplements des sables fins sur les pentes internes des recifs corallions de Tuléar (S.W. de Madagascar). Essai d'interpretation dynamique des peuplements de sables mobiles infralittoraux dans un complex recifal sourmis ou non aux influences terrigenes. Tethys. Suppl., 5, 157–220.Google Scholar
Trevallion, A., 1971. Studies on Tellina tenuis da Costa. III. Aspects of general biology and energy flow. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 7, 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevallion, A. and Ansell, A. D., 1969. A preliminary account of two sandy beaches in south-west India. Mar. Biol., 6, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevallion, A., Steele, J. H. and Edwards, R. R. C., 1970. Dynamics of a benthic bivalve. In Marine food chains, Steele, J. (Ed.), 285–295, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Wade, B. A., 1964. Notes on the ecology of Donax denticulatus (Linne). Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish Inst., 17th Ann. Sess., 36–41.Google Scholar